Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acetylcholine–dopamine balance hypothesis in the striatum: An update

Open access
Aosaki, Toshihiko, Miura, Masami, Suzuki, Takeo, Nishimura, Kinya, Masuda, Masao·2010·Geriatrics & Gerontology International

Abstract

The imbalance between cholinergic activity and dopaminergic activity in the striatum causes a variety of neurological disorders, such as Parkinson's disease. During sensorimotor learning, the arrival of a conditioned stimulus reporting a reward evokes a pause response in the firing of the tonically active cholinergic interneurons in targeted areas of the striatum, whereas the same stimulus triggers an increase in the firing frequency of the dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta. The pause response of the cholinergic interneurons begins with an initial depolarizing phase followed by a pause in spike firing and ensuing rebound excitation. The timing of the pause phase coincides well with the surge in dopaminergic firing, indicating that a dramatic rise in dopamine (DA) release occurs while nicotinic receptors remain unbound by acetylcholine. The pause response begins with dopamine D5 receptor‐dependent synaptic plasticity in the cholinergic neurons and an increased GABAergic IPSP, which is followed by a long pause in firing through D2 and D5 receptor‐dependent modulation of ion channels. Inactivation of muscarinic receptors on the projection neurons eventually yields endocannabinoid‐mediated, dopamine‐dependent long‐term depression in the medium spiny projection neurons. Breakdown of acetylcholine‐dopamine balance hampers proper functioning of the cortico‐basal ganglia‐thalamocortical loop circuits. In Parkinson's disease, dopamine depletion blocks autoinhibition of acetylcholine release through muscarinic autoreceptors, leading to excessive acetylcholine release which eventually prunes spines of the indirect‐pathway projection neurons of the striatum and thus interrupts information transfer from motor command centers in the cerebral cortex. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2010; 10 (Suppl. 1): S148–S157.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00588.x

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Aosaki, T., Miura, M., Suzuki, T., Nishimura, K., & Masuda, M.
Venue
Geriatrics & Gerontology International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-06-02
Volume
10
Issue
s1
Pages
S148-57
ISSN
  • 1444-1586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1447-0594
OpenAlex
W1487894289
Cited by
274
References
69
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acetylcholine–dopamine balance hypothesis in the striatum: An update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00588.x
The paper
Aosaki, T., Miura, M., Suzuki, T., Nishimura, K., & Masuda, M. (2010). Acetylcholine–dopamine balance hypothesis in the striatum: An update. Geriatrics & Gerontology International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00588.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.