Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Book Reviews

Open access
Jennings, William·2006·Journal of Communication

Abstract

At a time when U.S. book publishers have made 9/11 and terrorism into their own literary genres with over 2,000 books currently available, Carol Winkler’s In the Name of Terrorism: Presidents on Political Violence in the Post–World War II Era is a timely, important, and unique work. Readable as a history, a policy analysis, and as a rhetorical study, this book stands out because the author reminds us that the idea of terrorism has been an important weapon in every presidential administration’s linguistic arsenal since the 1960s. More importantly, she illustrates how the deployment of the concept in presidential discourse has usefully served to label enemies, establish cultural narratives, and—for better and worse—shape the direction of U.S. policy. In her quest for the definition of this vexing topic, Winkler directs her attention to the executive branch. The combination of president as commander in chief of the armed forces and as chief translator of clandestine intelligence data for the American public makes, “the executive branch … the single most vital source for understanding how terrorism functions within American culture” (p. 7). According to Winkler, what presidents say—and what they say about terrorism in particular—deserves attention because these utterances often justify the exercise of power.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 87

  1. Bateson G, 1972, Steps to an ecology of mind
  2. 10.2307/2579890 · DOI
  3. 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Berger P. L., 1966, The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge
  5. Berns N, 2004, Framing the victim: Domestic violence, media, and social problems
  6. 10.1080/01957470290055510 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0267323195010003005 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/105846001750322970 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cappella J. N., 1997, Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good, 10.1093/oso/9780195090635.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x · Paper page
  11. Dahinden U, 2006, Framing: Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation
  12. 10.1080/105846001750322934 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1177/0016549205056050 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Donati P. R, 1992, Studying collective action, 136
  15. Downs D, 2002, Written Communication, 19, 44, 10.1177/074108830201900103 · doi:10.1177/074108830201900103
  16. Edelman M, 1993, Political Communication, 10, 231, 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962981 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Entman R. M, 2004, Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy
  19. K Fisher . (1997 ). Locating frames in the discursive universe . , 2 (3 ). Retrieved May 18, 2000, from, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/3/4.html · DOI
  20. Fiske S. T., 1991, Social cognition
  21. Gamson W. A, 1992, Talking politics
  22. 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002105 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gamson W. A., 1983, Evaluating the welfare state. Social and political perspectives, 397, 10.1016/B978-0-12-657980-2.50032-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Gamson W. A., 1996, Comparative perspectives on social movements, 275, 10.1017/CBO9780511803987.014 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1086/229213 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gandy O. H., 2001, Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 355
  27. Gans H. J, 1979, Deciding what?s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time
  28. Ghanem S, 1997, Communication and democracy. Exploring the intellectual frontier in agenda-setting theory, 3
  29. Gitlin T, 1980, The whole world is watching. Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left
  30. Goffman E, 1974, Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience
  31. 10.2307/2067804 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Graber D. A, 1988, Processing the news: How people tame the information tide
  33. Gurevitch M., 1986, The main source: Learning from television news, 159
  34. Hackett R. A, 1984, Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 229, 10.1080/15295038409360036 · DOI
  35. Hall S, 1976, The manufacture of news: Social problems, deviance and the mass media, 176
  36. Hall S, 1980, Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-1979, 128
  37. Hall S, 1997, Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, 13
  38. 10.1207/s1532754xjprr1103_02 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Holstein J. A., 1990, Symbolic Interaction, 13, 103, 10.1525/si.1990.13.1.103 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Iyengar S, 1991, Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues, 10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Iyengar S., 1987, News that matters: Television and American opinion
  42. James W, 1950, The principles of psychology
  43. Jo E., 1994, Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 43
  44. Kinder D. R., 1990, Social Cognition, 8, 73, 10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.73 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01265.x · DOI · Paper page
  46. Maher T. M, 2001, Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 83
  47. McAdam D., 1996, Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing, 10.1017/CBO9780511803987 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02842.x · Paper page
  49. 10.1086/267990 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x · DOI · Paper page
  51. McCullagh C, 2002, Media power: A sociological introduction, 10.1007/978-1-137-04737-3 · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-04737-3
  52. McQuail D, 2005, McQuail?s mass communication theory
  53. Minsky M, 1975, The psychology of computer vision, 211
  54. 10.2307/2952075 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Neuman W. R., 1992, Common knowledge. News and the construction of political meaning, 10.7208/chicago/9780226161174.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1177/0016549299061002001 · doi:10.1177/0016549299061002001
  57. Pan Z. P., 1993, Political Communication, 10, 55, 10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Potter J, 1996, Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction, 10.4135/9781446222119 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Price V., 1997, Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion, 173
  60. Propp V. J, 1958, Morphology of the folktale
  61. Reese S. D, 2001, Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 1, 10.4324/9781410605689 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Roskos-Ewoldsen D. R., 2002, Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 97
  63. 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Scheufele B, 2004, Frames-Framing-Framing Effekte
  65. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Schon D. A., 1994, Frame reflection: Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies
  68. Schutz A, 1964, Collected papers, 1, 10.1007/978-94-017-6854-2 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x · Paper page
  70. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02676.x · DOI
  71. Shoemaker P. J., 1996, Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content
  72. Silverblatt A., 1999, Approaches to media literacy: A handbook
  73. Snow D., 1988, International Social Movement Research, 1, 197
  74. 10.1023/A:1006975321345 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Takeshita T, 1997, Communication and democracy: Exploring intellectual frontier in agenda-setting theory, 15
  76. Tankard J. W, 2001, Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, 95
  77. Tannen D, 1979, New directions in discourse processing, 137
  78. Tewksbury D., 2000, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 804, 10.1177/107769900007700406 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Tuchman G, 1978, Making news: A study in the construction of reality
  80. Van Dijk T. A, 1988, News as discourse
  81. 10.1177/0267323105058253 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1093/heapro/dag413 · DOI
  83. Watzlawick P., 1967, Pragmatics of human communications: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes
  84. Wicks R. H, 2001, Understanding audiences: Learning to use the media constructively
  85. Willnat L, 1997, Communication and democracy: Exploring intellectual frontier in agenda-setting theory, 51
  86. 10.1002/jcop.10015 · DOI
  87. Zald M. N, 1996, Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framing, 262

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Jennings, W.
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2006-11-09
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
869-870
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W2167937317
Cited by
288
References
7
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 3218 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Book Reviews. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x
The paper
Jennings, W. (2006). Book Reviews. Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.