Cited by 146Smoking Behavior and CessationMedia Influence and HealthBehavioral Health and Interventions

Perceived effectiveness of cessation advertisements: the importance of audience reactions and practical implications for media campaign planning

Davis, Kevin C., Nonnemaker, James, Duke, Jennifer, Farrelly, Matthew C.·2013·Health Communication

Abstract

Cessation television ads are often evaluated with measures of perceived effectiveness (PE) that gauge smokers' reactions to the ads. Although measures of PE have been validated for other genres of public service announcements, no studies to our knowledge have demonstrated the predictive validity of PE for cessation TV ads specifically. We analyzed data from a longitudinal Web survey of smokers in the United States to assess whether measures of PE for cessation TV ads are causally antecedent to cessation-related outcomes. These data consisted of baseline and 2-week follow-up surveys of 3,411 smokers who were shown a number of cessation TV ads and were asked to provide their appraisals of PE for those messages. We found that baseline PE for the ads was associated with increased negative feelings about smoking, increased outcome expectations about the benefits of quitting, increased consideration of the benefits of quitting, increased desire to quit, and increased intentions to quit smoking at follow-up. Results suggest that measures of PE for cessation TV ads can be powerful predictors of likely ad success. Hence, our findings support the use of PE in quantitative ad pretesting as part of a standard regimen of formative research for cessation television campaigns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10410236.2012.696535

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has suggested that messages with higher perceived effectiveness ratings may be more effective than those with lower ratings.

    “These findings are noteworthy, as research has suggested that messages with higher perceived effectiveness ratings may be more effective than those with lower ratings.82–84”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, K. C., Nonnemaker, J., Duke, J., & Farrelly, M. C.
Affiliations
RTI International (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Kevin C.
Venue
Health Communication
Published
2012-07-19
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
461-472
ISSN
  • 1041-0236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7027
OpenAlex
W2167577481
Cited by
146
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, television advertising, perceived effectiveness, audience response, predictive validity, formative research, smoking cessation intentions, outcome expectations, smokers
MeSH terms
Advertising, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Persuasive Communication, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review