The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
It's Okay to Shoot a Character: Moral Disengagement in Violent Video Games
Open accessAbstract
What makes virtual violence enjoyable rather than aversive? Two 2×2 experiments tested the assumption that moral disengagement cues provided by a violent video game's narrative and game play lessen users' guilt and negative affect, which would otherwise undermine players' enjoyment of the game. Experiment 1 found that users' familiarity with the violent game reduced guilt and negative affect, and enhanced enjoyment, whereas opponents' nonhuman outer appearance and blameworthiness had no effect. Experiment 2 found that fighting for a just purpose, perceiving less mayhem, and framing the overall situation as “just a game” or “just an experiment” reduced guilt and negative affect, whereas the distorted portrayal of consequences did not. Effects on game enjoyment were mixed and suggest that moral disengagement cues may both foster and diminish game enjoyment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This is evidenced by the research of Heberlein and Adolphs [22], Morrison and Ziemke [34], Yee et al. [48] pointing to the fact that players would perceive game characters not as objects but as social entities with morality.”
From “I Don’t Want To Shoot The Android”: Players Translate Real-Life Moral Intuitions to In-Game Decisions in Detroit: Become Human (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
Davis, M. H. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113 · Cited by 10,272
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022 · cited 1×
“Also, according to Mar and Macrae (2006), ‘‘[Humans] routinely view quite abstract nonliving representations as if they were intentional agents’’ (p. 110, see also ‘‘Ethopoeia’’ in Nass & Moon, 2000).”
BackgroundAn Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Moral Emotions and Moral Behavior
Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070145 · Cited by 3,222
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 8×
“…15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 868 Journal of Communication 59 (2009) 865–890 © 2009 International Communication Association T. Hartmann & P. Vorderer Moral Disengagement neglect of a character’s moral status and human essence (Haslam, 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialIzard, C. E. (1977) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2209-0 · Cited by 2,825
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Baron, 1994, Human aggression
- Cantor, 2002, Media effects, 287
- Green, 2004, Blurring the lines: The psychology of entertainment media, 161
- Klimmt, 2008, Games without frontiers-wars without tears
- Ladas, 2002, Wirkung und Nutzung von Gewalt in Computerspielen [Brutal players? Uses and effects of violent video games]
- Morrison, 2005, Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Virtual Social Agents, 73
- Raney, 2006, Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences, 165
- Shapiro, 2006, Playing computer games: Motives, responses, and consequences, 275
- Skalski, 2006, Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Workshop on Presence
- Smith, 2006, Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences, 43
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Video Games Do Affect Social Outcomes
Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D. O. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213520459 · Cited by 652
Horton and Wohl revisited: exploring viewers’ experience of parasocial interaction
Hartmann, T., & Goldhoorn, C. (2011) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x · Cited by 569
“Enjoyment was measured with five items taken from Hartmann and Vorderer (2010).”
MethodSelf-citationMoore, C. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.018 · Cited by 326
“When virtual violence was framed as morally justified, participants felt less guilt and experienced fewer negative emotions after playing, suggesting that the availability of cues to morally disengage influences individuals’ affective reactions to violent behavior [52].”
BackgroundElson, M., & Ferguson, C. J. (2014) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000147 · Cited by 237
“In-game justification of the digital violence also seems to matter, as participants in the study of Hartmann, Toz, and Brandon (2010) felt guiltier when their violent actions were presented as unjus-tified (see also Hartmann & Vorderer, 2010).”
BackgroundThe Guilty Couch Potato: The Role of Ego Depletion in Reducing Recovery Through Media Use
Reinecke, L., Hartmann, T., & Eden, A. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12107 · Cited by 187
“Prior research suggests that feelings of guilt reduce media enjoyment (Hartmann & Vorderer, 2010; Lin, 2011).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hartmann, T., & Vorderer, P.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- ORCID
- Hartmann, Tilo
- Venue
- Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-119
- ISSN
- 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2466
- OpenAlex
- W2131583517
- Semantic Scholar
- da821a39ea4bbbb7a2206d8bf3f24f6f49c80b94
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 49.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- moral disengagement, violent video games, game enjoyment, guilt, negative affect, game narrative, culpability, perceived consequences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
