Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimulus‐Dependent Neuronal Oscillations in Cat Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Properties and Feature Dependence

Gray, Charles M., Engel, Andreas K., König, Peter, Singer, Wolf·1990·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previously we have demonstrated that neurons in the striate cortex of lightly anaesthetized cats exhibit oscillatory responses at a frequency near 50 Hz in response to their preferred stimuli. Here we have used both single and multiple unit recording techniques to determine: (i) the receptive field properties and laminar distribution of cells exhibiting oscillatory responses; and (ii) the influence of changing stimulus properties on the temporal behaviour of the oscillatory responses. Oscillatory responses were detected and evaluated by computation of the autocorrelation function of the neuronal spike trains. We recorded oscillatory responses in 56% of the standard complex cells and in 12% and 11% of the simple and special complex cells. Cells exhibiting oscillatory responses were located primarily in supra‐ and infragranular layers. The oscillatory modulation amplitude of the autocorrelation function was enhanced by binocular stimulation (9 out of 16 cells) and reduced by combined stimulation with optimal and orthogonally orientated light bars (16 out of 21 cells). Changing stimulus orientation caused no change in the oscillation frequency of the sampled population of cells, while oscillation frequency increased monotonically with respect to stimulus velocity within the range of 1–12 degrees per second (10 out of 11 cells). The oscillatory modulation of the autocorrelation function increased as a function of stimulus length within the boundary of the cell's receptive field (11 out of 11 cells). In 6 out of these 11 cells, the responses did not show an oscillatory modulation if elicited by small moving spots of light. Moving stimuli were much more effective in evoking oscillatory responses than were stationary stimuli (19 out of 20 cells). In no instance, using either stationary or moving stimuli, was the phase of the oscillatory response synchronized with the stimulus. These results demonstrate functional heterogeneity among cells within striate cortex based on their temporal firing patterns and provide evidence that the temporal pattern of oscillatory cellular activity is influenced by changes in stimulus properties.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00450.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Gray, C. M., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-07
Volume
2
Issue
7
Pages
607-619
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2056570598
Cited by
318
References
8
FWCI
11.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulus‐Dependent Neuronal Oscillations in Cat Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Properties and Feature Dependence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00450.x
The paper
Gray, C. M., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W. (1990). Stimulus‐Dependent Neuronal Oscillations in Cat Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Properties and Feature Dependence. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1990.tb00450.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.