Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Synaptic Plasticity in an In Vitro Slice Preparation of the Rat Nucleus Accumbens

Pennartz, C. M. A., Ameerun, R. F., Groenewegen, H. J., Lopes da Silva, F. H.·1993·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Extra‐ and intracellular recordings in slices were used to examine what types of synaptic plasticity can be found in the core of the nucleus accumbens, and how these forms of plasticity may be modulated by dopamine. Stimulus electrodes were placed at the rostral border of the nucleus accumbens in order to excite primarily infralimbic and prelimbic afferents, as was confirmed by injections of the retrograde tracer fluoro‐gold. In extracellular recordings, tetanization induced long‐term potentiation (LTP) of the population spike in 20 out of 53 slices. The presynaptic compound action potential did not change following LTP induction. For the intracellularly recorded excitatory postsynaptic potential, three types of synaptic plasticity were noted: long‐term potentiation (16 out of 54 cells), decremental potentiation (eight cells) and long‐term depression (LTD; six cells). No correlation was found between the occurrence of potentiation or depression and various parameters of the tetanic depolarization (e.g. peak voltage, integral under the curve). The N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor antagonist d(–)‐2‐amino‐5‐phosphonopentanoic acid (50 μM; d‐AP5) reduced, but did not completely prevent, the induction of LTP. The incidence of LTD was not markedly affected by d‐AP5. No difference in LTP was found when comparing slices bathed in dopamine (10 μM) and controls. Likewise, slices treated with a mixture of the D1 receptor antagonist Sch 23390 (1 μM) and the D2 antagonist S(–)‐sulpiride (1 μM) generated a similar amount of LTP as controls. In conclusion, both LTP and LTD can be induced in a key structure of the limbic‐innervated basal ganglia. LTP in the nucleus accumbens strongly depends on N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor activity, but is not significantly affected by dopamine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00475.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Pennartz, C. M. A., Ameerun, R. F., Groenewegen, H. J., & Lopes da Silva, F. H.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
107-117
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2036404914
Cited by
178
References
5
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synaptic Plasticity in an In Vitro Slice Preparation of the Rat Nucleus Accumbens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00475.x
The paper
Pennartz, C. M. A., Ameerun, R. F., Groenewegen, H. J., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1993). Synaptic Plasticity in an In Vitro Slice Preparation of the Rat Nucleus Accumbens. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1993.tb00475.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.