The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gamma‐range Activity Evoked by Coherent Visual Stimuli in Humans
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis of a role of gamma‐range synchronized oscillatory activity in visual feature binding by recording evoked potentials from 12 subjects to three stimuli: two coherent ones (a Kanizsa triangle and a real triangle) and a non‐coherent one (a Kanizsa triangle in which the inducing disks had been rotated so that no triangle could be perceived). The evoked potentials were analysed by convoluting the signal for each subject and each stimulation type by Gabor wavelets centred from 28 up to 46 Hz, providing a continuous measure of frequency‐specific power over time. A first peak of activity was found around 38 Hz and 100 ms with a maximum at electrode Cz in each experimental condition. A second peak of activity occurred around 30 Hz and 230 ms, with a maximum at O1 in response to the real triangle and a maximum at Cz in the case of the illusory triangle. At 100 ms we did not find any variations of the gamma‐band component of the evoked potential with stimulation type, but the power of the 30 Hz component of the evoked potential between 210 and 290 ms differed from noise only in the case of a coherent triangle, no matter whether real or illusory. We thus found a 30 Hz component whose power correlates with stimulus coherency, which supports the hypothesis of a functional role of high‐frequency synchronization in feature binding. Moreover, this correlation seemed specific to the gamma‐frequency range, as neither the power of the low‐frequency components (0–25 Hz) nor the power of the electromyogram range components (60–80 Hz) showed the same effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning
Singer, W. (1993) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ph.55.030193.002025 · Cited by 1,685
Coherent 40-Hz oscillation characterizes dream state in humans.
Llinás, R., & Ribary, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.5.2078 · Cited by 962
Kanizsa, G. (1976) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0476-48 · Cited by 503
Cited by
von Stein, A., & Sarnthein, J. (2000) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(00)00172-0 · Cited by 1,553
Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human
Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04240.1996 · Cited by 1,534
Self-citationPulvermüller, F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x9900182x · Cited by 1,284
Herrmann, C. S. (2001) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s002210100682 · Cited by 1,080
Dawson, G., Webb, S. J., & McPartland, J. (2005) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn2703_6 · Cited by 989
Metadata
- Authors
- Tallon, C., Bertrand, O., Bouchet, P., & Pernier, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1285-1291
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2161152117
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gamma‐range Activity Evoked by Coherent Visual Stimuli in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb01118.x
- The paper
- Tallon, C., Bertrand, O., Bouchet, P., & Pernier, J. (1995). Gamma‐range Activity Evoked by Coherent Visual Stimuli in Humans. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1995.tb01118.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.