The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human
Open accessAbstract
Considerable interest has been raised by non-phase-locked episodes of synchronization in the gamma-band (30–60 Hz). One of their putative roles in the visual modality is feature-binding. We tested the stimulus specificity of high-frequency oscillations in humans using three types of visual stimuli: two coherent stimuli (a Kanizsa and a real triangle) and a noncoherent stimulus (“no-triangle stimulus”). The task of the subject was to count the occurrences of a curved illusory triangle. A time–frequency analysis of single-trial EEG data recorded from eight human subjects was performed to characterize phase-locked as well as non-phase-locked high-frequency activities. We found an early phase-locked 40 Hz component, maximal at electrodes Cz–C4, which does not vary with stimulation type. We describe a second 40 Hz component, appearing around 280 msec, that is not phase-locked to stimulus onset. This component is stronger in response to a coherent triangle, whether real or illusory: it could reflect, therefore, a mechanism of feature binding based on high-frequency synchronization. Because both the illusory and the real triangle are more target-like, it could also correspond to an oscillatory mechanism for testing the match between stimulus and target. At the same latencies, the low-frequency evoked response components phase-locked to stimulus onset behave differently, suggesting that low- and high-frequency activities have different functional roles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex
Gray, C. M., & Singer, W. (1989) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.86.5.1698 · Cited by 2,463
Eckhorn, R., Bauer, R., Jordan, W., Brosch, M., Kruse, W., Munk, M., & Reitboeck, H. J. (1988) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00202899 · Cited by 2,330
Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed).
Groeneveld, R. A., & Conover, W. J. (1981) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2287607 · Cited by 1,849
Gamma (40-100 Hz) oscillation in the hippocampus of the behaving rat
Bragin, A., Jando, G., Nadasdy, Z., Hetke, J., Wise, K., & Buzsaki, G. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00047.1995 · Cited by 1,527
A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp.
Galambos, R., Makeig, S., & Talmachoff, P. J. (1981) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.78.4.2643 · Cited by 1,247
Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses
von der Heydt, R., Peterhans, E., & Baumgartner, G. (1984) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6539501 · Cited by 1,060
Coherent 40-Hz oscillation characterizes dream state in humans.
Llinás, R., & Ribary, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.5.2078 · Cited by 962
Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones
Makeig, S. (1993) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(93)90110-h · Cited by 844
Temporal coding in the visual cortex: new vistas on integration in the nervous system
Engel, A. K., König, P., Kreiter, A. K., Schillen, T. B., & Singer, W. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90039-b · Cited by 755
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gray, 1995, Stimulus-dependent neuronal oscillations in areas V1 and V2 of the alert macaque monkey., Soc Neurosci Abstr, 592, 2
Cited by
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Neuronal Synchrony: A Versatile Code for the Definition of Relations?
Singer, W. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1 · Cited by 2,581
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses
Makeig, S., Westerfield, M., Jung, T.-P., Enghoff, S., Townsend, J., Courchesne, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1066168 · Cited by 1,630
Temporal binding and the neural correlates of sensory awareness.
Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01568-0 · Cited by 1,372
Metadata
- Authors
- Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-07-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 4240-4249
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2169756567
- Cited by
- 1,534
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04240.1996
- The paper
- Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1996). Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04240.1996
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
