The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benefit of valproic acid in suppressing disease progression of ALS model mice
Abstract
Valproic acid (VPA) has long been used as an antiepileptic drug and recently as a mood stabilizer, and evidence is increasing that VPA exerts neuroprotective effects through changes in a variety of intracellular signalling pathways including upregulation of Bcl‐2 protein with an antiapoptotic property and inhibiting glycogen synthase kinase 3‐β, which is considered to promote cell survival. Although the neuroprotective effects of VPA have been demonstrated in a murine model of human immunodeficiency virus‐1 encephalitis, there have been no reports on the effect of VPA in chronic progressing neurodegenerative disease models including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). ALS is a devastating disease selectively affecting motoneurons, and its disease model mice bear a close resemblance to ALS symptomatically and pathologically. First, we used an organotypic slice culture using mouse spinal cord, and showed that VPA protected spinal motoneurons against death from glutamate toxicity in vitro. Then, we treated ALS model mice with VPA at the dose effective level for epileptic model mice after 45 days of age (pre‐onset treatment) or the day of the disease onset (post‐onset treatment). We found a significant prolongation of the disease duration in ALS model mice in both methods of treatment. Considering the long usage of VPA for epileptic patients with good tolerance and safety, these data strongly support the clinical application of VPA for ALS treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current hypotheses for the underlying biology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Rothstein, J. D. (2009) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21543 · Cited by 703
Multiple roles of HDAC inhibition in neurodegenerative conditions
Chuang, D.-M., Leng, Y., Marinova, Z., Kim, H.-J., & Chiu, C.-T. (2009) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.06.002 · Cited by 676
VEGF: once regarded as a specific angiogenic factor, now implicated in neuroprotection
Storkebaum, E., Lambrechts, D., & Carmeliet, P. (2004) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20092 · Cited by 507
Therapeutic potential of mood stabilizers lithium and valproic acid:Beyond bipolar disorder
Chiu, C.-T., Wang, Z., Hunsberger, J. G., & Chuang, D.-M. (2013) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.111.005512 · Cited by 404
The epigenetics of aging and neurodegeneration
Lardenoije, R., Iatrou, A., Kenis, G., Kompotis, K., Steinbusch, H. W. M., Mastroeni, D., Coleman, P., Lemere, C. A., Hof, P. R., van den Hove, D. L. A., et al. (2015) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2015.05.002 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Sugai, F., Yamamoto, Y., Miyaguchi, K., Zhou, Z., Sumi, H., Hamasaki, T., Goto, M., & Sakoda, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3179-3183
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2138084122
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefit of valproic acid in suppressing disease progression of ALS model mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03765.x
- The paper
- Sugai, F., Yamamoto, Y., Miyaguchi, K., Zhou, Z., Sumi, H., Hamasaki, T., Goto, M., & Sakoda, S. (2004). Benefit of valproic acid in suppressing disease progression of ALS model mice. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03765.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.