Simulation of robustness against lesions of cortical networks
Open accessAbstract
Structure entails function, and thus a structural description of the brain will help to understand its function and may provide insights into many properties of brain systems, from their robustness and recovery from damage to their dynamics and even their evolution. Advances in the analysis of complex networks provide useful new approaches to understanding structural and functional properties of brain networks. Structural properties of networks recently described allow their characterization as small‐world, random (exponential) and scale‐free. They complement the set of other properties that have been explored in the context of brain connectivity, such as topology, hodology, clustering and hierarchical organization. Here we apply new network analysis methods to cortical interareal connectivity networks for the cat and macaque brains. We compare these corticocortical fibre networks to benchmark rewired, small‐world, scale‐free and random networks using two analysis strategies, in which we measure the effects of the removal of nodes and connections on the structural properties of the cortical networks. The structural decay of the brain networks is in most respects similar to that of scale‐free networks. The results implicate highly connected hub‐nodes and bottleneck connections as a structural basis for some of the conditional robustness of brain systems. This informs the understanding of the development of connectivity of the brain networks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The degree distribution of brain networks is difficult to accurately reproduce due to the small number of overall connections using common parcellations.
“The degree distribution of brain networks is difficult to accurately reproduce due to the small number of overall connections using common parcellations.56”
From Graph theory analysis of complex brain networks: new concepts in brain mapping applied to neurosurgery (2016) · cites this paper as [56]
The robustness conferred by an exponentially truncated power law degree distribution is more likely a byproduct of the formation of developing efficient processing rather than brain development selecting for it.
“Rather than brain development selecting for such robustness, it is more likely that it is a byproduct of the formation of developing efficient processing (for example, through a rich-club organizational topology).56”
From Graph theory analysis of complex brain networks: new concepts in brain mapping applied to neurosurgery (2016) · cites this paper as [56]
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783 · see citing works
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35019019 · Cited by 7,534 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820 · see citing works
Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter?
Zalesky, A., Fornito, A., Harding, I. H., Cocchi, L., Yücel, M., Pantelis, C., & Bullmore, E. T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.027 · Cited by 1,169 · see citing works
Can structure predict function in the human brain?
Honey, C. J., Thivierge, J.-P., & Sporns, O. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.071 · Cited by 629 · see citing works
Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain
Alstott, J., Breakspear, M., Hagmann, P., Cammoun, L., & Sporns, O. (2009) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000408 · Cited by 561 · see citing works
Temporal and spatial evolution of brain network topology during the first two years of life
Gao, W., Gilmore, J. H., Giovanello, K. S., Smith, J. K., Shen, D., Zhu, H., & Lin, W. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025278 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Vértes, P. E., & Bullmore, E. T. (2015) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12365 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Mapping Connectivity Damage in the Case of Phineas Gage
Van Horn, J. D., Irimia, A., Torgerson, C. M., Chambers, M. C., Kikinis, R., & Toga, A. W. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037454 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Running rewires the neuronal network of adult-born dentate granule cells
Vivar, C., Peterson, B. D., & van Praag, H. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.031 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
A DTI-Derived Measure of Cortico-Cortical Connectivity
Zalesky, A., & Fornito, A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2008.2012113 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Hierarchy and dynamics of neural networks
Kaiser, M. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2010.00112 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Self-citationHart, M. G., Ypma, R. J. F., Romero-Garcia, R., Price, S. J., & Suckling, J. (2016) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2015.4.jns142683 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Bezgin, G., Vakorin, V. A., van Opstal, A. J., McIntosh, A. R., & Bakker, R. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.013 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaiser, M., Martin, R., Andras, P., & Young, M. P.
- Affiliations
- Constructor University (DE)
- Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3185-3192
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W1933848166
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cortical networks, structural connectivity, node removal, scale-free networks, small-world networks, random networks, network hubs, cat brain, macaque brain, network rewiring
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain Damage, Chronic, Cats, Cerebral Cortex, Macaca, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways, Species Specificity, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review