Cited by 63Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

Hundreds of brain maps in one atlas: registering coordinate-independent primate neuro-anatomical data to a standard brain

Open access
Bezgin, Gleb, Vakorin, Vasily A., van Opstal, A. John, McIntosh, Anthony R., Bakker, Rembrandt·2012·NeuroImage

Abstract

Non-invasive measuring methods such as EEG/MEG, fMRI and DTI are increasingly utilised to extract quantitative information on functional and anatomical connectivity in the human brain. These methods typically register their data in Euclidean space, so that one can refer to a particular activity pattern by specifying its spatial coordinates. Since each of these methods has limited resolution in either the time or spatial domain, incorporating additional data, such as those obtained from invasive animal studies, would be highly beneficial to link structure and function. Here we describe an approach to spatially register all cortical brain regions from the macaque structural connectivity database CoCoMac, which contains the combined tracing study results from 459 publications (http://cocomac.g-node.org). Brain regions from 9 different brain maps were directly mapped to a standard macaque cortex using the tool Caret (Van Essen and Dierker, 2007). The remaining regions in the CoCoMac database were semantically linked to these 9 maps using previously developed algebraic and machine-learning techniques (Bezgin et al., 2008; Stephan et al., 2000). We analysed neural connectivity using several graph-theoretical measures to capture global properties of the derived network, and found that Markov Centrality provides the most direct link between structure and function. With this registration approach, users can query the CoCoMac database by specifying spatial coordinates. Availability of deformation tools and homology evidence then allow one to directly attribute detailed anatomical animal data to human experimental results.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.013

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In animal studies, comprehensive histologically and functionally defined whole-brain areal parcellations are feasible.

    “In animal studies (rodents and non-human primates), this is feasible through the use of comprehensive, histologically and functionally defined whole-brain areal parcellations (Bezgin et al., 2012; Lein et al., 2007; Paxinos et al., 2000; Saleem and Logothetis, 2007; Swanson, 2015; Van Essen et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brodmann, K., 1905. Beitrage zur histologischen Localisation der Grosshirnrinde. Dritte Mitteilung. Die Rindenfelder der niederen Affen. Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie 4, 177-226.
  2. Kleinberg, J., 1999. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM 46, 604-632.
  3. Paxinos, G., Huang, X-F., Toga, A.W., 2000. The Rhesus Monkey Brain In Stereotactic Coordinates. Academic Press, San Diego.
  4. Paxinos, G., Huang, X-F., Petrides, M., Toga, A.W., 2008. The Rhesus Monkey Brain In Stereotactic Coordinates. Academic Press, San Diego.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bezgin, G., Vakorin, V. A., van Opstal, A. J., McIntosh, A. R., & Bakker, R.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Bezgin, Gleb
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
67-76
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022933299
Cited by
63
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • McDonnell Baycrest (737100401)
  • German INCF Node (BMBF (01GQ0801)
  • Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology, JUGENE (JINB33)
  • Next-Generation Supercomputer Project of MEXT, Japan (269921)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
macaque cortex, structural connectivity, brain atlas, spatial registration, caret, cortical maps, homology
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Computer Simulation, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Macaca, Models, Anatomic, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Reference Values, Software, Subtraction Technique, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review