The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes taste stimuli
Abstract
How does selective attention to affect influence sensory processing? In an fMRI investigation, when subjects were instructed to remember and rate the pleasantness of a taste stimulus, 0.1 m monosodium glutamate, activations were greater in the medial orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortex than when subjects were instructed to remember and rate the intensity of the taste. When the subjects were instructed to remember and rate the intensity, activations were greater in the insular taste cortex. An interaction analysis showed that this dissociation of taste processing, depending on whether attention to pleasantness or intensity was relevant, was highly significant (P < 0.0002). Thus, depending on the context in which tastes are presented and whether affect is relevant, the brain responds to a taste differently. These findings show that, when attention is paid to affective value, the brain systems engaged to represent the sensory stimulus of taste are different from those engaged when attention is directed to the physical properties of a stimulus such as its intensity. This differential biasing of brain regions engaged in processing a sensory stimulus, depending on whether the cognitive demand is for affect‐related vs. more sensory‐related processing, may be an important aspect of cognition and attention. This has many implications for understanding the effects not only of taste but also of other sensory stimuli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205 · Cited by 8,388
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 · Cited by 3,431
The orbitofrontal cortex: Neuronal activity in the behaving monkey
Thorpe, S. J., Rolls, E. T., & Maddison, S. (1983) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235545 · Cited by 836
Self-citationRolls, E. T., Sienkiewicz, Z. J., & Yaxley, S. (1989) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00774.x · Cited by 466
Self-citationHuman cortical gustatory areas: A review of functional neuroimaging data
Small, D. M., Zald, D. H., Jones-Gotman, M., Zatorre, R. J., Pardo, J. V., Frey, S., & Petrides, M. (1999) · NeuroReport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199901180-00002 · Cited by 431
Orbitofrontal cortex neurons: role in olfactory and visual association learning
Rolls, E. T., Critchley, H. D., Mason, R., & Wakeman, E. A. (1996) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.1970 · Cited by 398
Self-citationRolls, E. T. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570035.001.0001 · Cited by 339
Self-citationGrabenhorst, F., Rolls, E. T., & Bilderbeck, A. (2008) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm185 · Cited by 337
Self-citationYaxley, S., Rolls, E. T., & Sienkiewicz, Z. J. (1988) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(88)90074-1 · Cited by 206
Self-citationHuman cortical representation of oral temperature
Guest, S., Grabenhorst, F., Essick, G., Chen, Y., Young, M., McGlone, F., de Araujo, I., & Rolls, E. T. (2007) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.07.004 · Cited by 129
Cited by
The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory
Rolls, E. T. (2019) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01945-2 · Cited by 859
Self-citationValue, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex
Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.004 · Cited by 766
Self-citationThe orbitofrontal cortex: reward, emotion and depression
Rolls, E. T., Cheng, W., & Feng, J. (2020) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaa196 · Cited by 474
Self-citationNeural representations of subjective reward value
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.04.031 · Cited by 405
The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing.
de Manzano, Ö., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., & Ullén, F. (2010) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0018432 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 723-729
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W2092781723
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes taste stimuli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06033.x
- The paper
- Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2008). Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes taste stimuli. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06033.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.