The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion
Open accessAbstract
Niche‐based models calibrated in the native range by relating species observations to climatic variables are commonly used to predict the potential spatial extent of species’ invasion. This climate matching approach relies on the assumption that invasive species conserve their climatic niche in the invaded ranges. We test this assumption by analysing the climatic niche spaces of Spotted Knapweed in western North America and Europe. We show with robust cross‐continental data that a shift of the observed climatic niche occurred between native and non‐native ranges, providing the first empirical evidence that an invasive species can occupy climatically distinct niche spaces following its introduction into a new area. The models fail to predict the current invaded distribution, but correctly predict areas of introduction. Climate matching is thus a useful approach to identify areas at risk of introduction and establishment of newly or not‐yet‐introduced neophytes, but may not predict the full extent of invasions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
Cited by
The art of modelling range-shifting species: The art of modelling range-shifting species
Elith, J., Kearney, M., & Phillips, S. (2010) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2010.00036.x · Cited by 2,813
Hutchinson's duality: The once and future niche
Colwell, R. K., & Rangel, T. F. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0901650106 · Cited by 769
Climate change increases risk of plant invasion in the Eastern United States
Bradley, B. A., Wilcove, D. S., & Oppenheimer, M. (2010) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-009-9597-y · Cited by 330
Predicting Distributions of Invasive Species
Elith, J. (2017) · Invasive Species · doi:10.1017/9781139019606.006 · Cited by 106
Epigenetic Responses of Trees to Environmental Stress in the Context of Climate Change
Miryeganeh, M., & Armitage, D. W. (2025) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.13132 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Broennimann, O., Treier, U. A., Müller‐Schärer, H., Thuiller, W., Peterson, A. T., & Guisan, A.
- Venue
- Ecology Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-06-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 701-709
- ISSN
- 1461-023X (ISSN-L)
- 1461-0248
- OpenAlex
- W2154791458
- Cited by
- 1,125
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01060.x
- The paper
- Broennimann, O., Treier, U. A., Müller‐Schärer, H., Thuiller, W., Peterson, A. T., & Guisan, A. (2007). Evidence of climatic niche shift during biological invasion. Ecology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01060.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.