Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 501

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology

Marzorati, Massimo, Wittebolle, Lieven, Boon, Nico, Daffonchio, Daniele, Verstraete, Willy·2008·Environmental Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Community‐level molecular techniques are widely used in comparative microbial ecology to assess the diversity of microbial communities and their response to changing environments. These include among others denaturing and temperature gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE/TGGE), single‐strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), length heterogeneity‐PCR (LH‐PCR), terminal‐restriction fragment length polymorphism (tRFLP) and 16S rRNA gene clone libraries. The amount of data derived from these techniques available in literature is continuously increasing and the lack of a universal way to interpret the raw fingerprint itself makes it difficult to compare between different results. Taking the DGGE technique as an example, we propose a setting‐independent theoretical interpretation of the DGGE pattern, based on a straightforward processing on three levels of analysis: (i) the range‐weighted richness ( Rr ) reflecting the carrying capacity of the system, (ii) the dynamics ( Dy ) reflecting the specific rate of species coming to significance, and (iii) functional organization ( Fo ), defined through a relation between the structure of a microbial community and its functionality. These Rr , Dy and Fo values, each representing a score to describe a microbial community, can be plotted in a 3D graph. The latter represents a visual ecological interpretation of the initial raw fingerprinting pattern.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01572.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 501

Metadata

Authors
Marzorati, M., Wittebolle, L., Boon, N., Daffonchio, D., & Verstraete, W.
Venue
Environmental Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
1571-1581
ISSN
  • 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-2920
OpenAlex
W1578737958
Cited by
501
References
2
FWCI
30.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01572.x
The paper
Marzorati, M., Wittebolle, L., Boon, N., Daffonchio, D., & Verstraete, W. (2008). How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01572.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.