The hologenome theory of evolution contains Lamarckian aspects within a Darwinian framework
Abstract
Summary: The hologenome theory of evolution emphasizes the role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants. The theory posits that the holobiont (host plus all of its symbiont microbiota) is a unit of selection in evolution. Genetic variation in the holobiont that can occur either in the host and/or in the microbial symbiont genomes (together termed hologenome) can then be transmitted to offspring. In addition to the known modes of variation, i.e. sexual recombination, chromosomal rearrangement and mutation, variation in the holobiont can occur also via two mechanisms that are specific to the hologenome theory: amplification of existing microorganisms and acquisition of novel strains from the environment. These mechanisms are Lamarckian in that (i) they are regulated by ‘use and disuse’ (of microbes) and (ii) the variations in the hologenome are transmitted to offspring, thus satisfying also the Lamarckian principle of ‘inheritance of acquired characteristics’. Accordingly, the hologenome theory incorporates Lamarckian aspects within a Darwinian framework, accentuating both cooperation and competition within the holobiont and with other holobionts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Behavior that facilitates social interaction among holobionts might be considered evolutionarily adaptive/advantageous because it gives rise to greater transmission of microbiota, thereby enhancing genetic variation.
“behavior that facilitates social interaction among holobionts might be considered evolutionarily adaptive/advantageous as it gives rise to greater transmission of microbiota, thereby enhancing genetic variation (Rosenberg et al., 2010;Rosenberg et al., 2009;Zilber-Rosenberg and Rosenberg, 2008).”
From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Rosenberg et al., 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cryan, J. F., O'Riordan, K. J., Cowan, C. S. M., Sandhu, K. V., Bastiaanssen, T. F. S., Boehme, M., Codagnone, M. G., Cussotto, S., Fulling, C., Golubeva, A. V., et al. (2019) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00018.2018 · Cited by 5,286 · see citing works
Proteobacteria: Microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota
Shin, N.-R., Whon, T. W., & Bae, J.-W. (2015) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.06.011 · Cited by 3,954 · see citing works
Outer Membrane Vesicles of a Human Commensal Mediate Immune Regulation and Disease Protection
Shen, Y., Torchia, M. L. G., Lawson, G. W., Karp, C. L., Ashwell, J. D., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2012) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2012.08.004 · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Microbial genes, brain & behaviour – epigenetic regulation of the gut–brain axis
Stilling, R. M., Dinan, T. G., & Cryan, J. F. (2014) · Genes, Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1111/gbb.12109 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
Current challenges and best-practice protocols for microbiome analysis
Bharti, R., & Grimm, D. G. (2021) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz155 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
The human microbiome in evolution
Davenport, E. R., Sanders, J. G., Song, S. J., Amato, K. R., Clark, A. G., & Knight, R. (2017) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0454-7 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Hepatic circadian clock oscillators and nuclear receptors integrate microbiome-derived signals
Montagner, A., Korecka, A., Polizzi, A., Lippi, Y., Blum, Y., Canlet, C., Tremblay-Franco, M., Gautier-Stein, A., Burcelin, R., Yen, Y.-C., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20127 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
The role of host molecules in communication with the resident and pathogenic microbiota: A review
White, J. R., Dauros-Singorenko, P., Hong, J., Vanholsbeeck, F., Phillips, A., & Swift, S. (2020) · Medicine in Microecology · doi:10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100005 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rosenberg, E., Sharon, G., & Zilber‐Rosenberg, I.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2959-2962
- ISSN
- 1462-2912
- 1462-2920
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review