Cited by 691Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Outcomes and InfluencesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The Impact of Emotions on Learning and Achievement: Towards a Theory of Cognitive/Motivational Mediators

Pekrun, Reinhard·1992·Applied Psychology

Abstract

Cet article esquisse les grandes lignes d'une modélisation de l'influence des émotions sur la formation et la réussite des étudiants. De tels effets ont été abordés empiriquement pour ce qui est de l'anxiété due au testing et de l'état d'esprit positif ou négatif. On peut soutenir que bien d'autres émotions agissent sur la performance. L'élaboration d'hypothèses sur ce genre d'influences présuppose qu'elles doivent être médiatisées a) par des mécanismes cognitifs de stockage, de traitement et de restitution de l'information; par l'impact de l'émotion sur l'attention et b) par les motivations intrinsèques et extrinsèques liées au travail universitaire. On fait l'hypothèse que les effets globaux des émotions dépendent de l'intéraction de différents mécanismes. Les effets nets des émotions positives sont supposés être positifs dans la plupart des cas tandis que les effets bruts des émotions négatives peuvent être ambivalents. Les principales retombées sur la recherche en psychologie appliquée sont décrites. This paper outlines assumptions of a model on how emotions influence students' learning and achievement. Such effects have been studied empirically for test anxiety, and for positive vs. negative mood. It may be assumed, however, that many other emotions exert effects on performance as well. Assumptions on such influences imply that they may be mediated: (1) by cognitive mechanisms of storage and retrieval of information, of processing information, and of emotion's attentiona…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1992.tb00712.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotions are an important factor in any learning process, since they influence information processing, memory and performance.

    “It is commonly acknowledged that emotions are an important factor in any learning process, since it influences information processing, memory and performance (Pekrun, 1992).”

    From Towards multimodal emotion recognition in e-learning environments (2016) · cites this paper as Pekrun, 1992

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pekrun, R.
Affiliations
University of Regensburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Pekrun, Reinhard
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-10
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
359-376
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
OpenAlex
W2054420970
Cited by
691
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 26
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
emotions, learning, academic performance, test anxiety, positive mood, negative mood, cognitive mediation, attention, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, information storage and retrieval

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review