Cited by 52Emotions and Moral BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Researching state shame with the experiential shame scale.

Turner, Jeannine E.·2014·The Journal of Psychology

Abstract

Although debilitating effects of experiencing shame are posited in several theories of emotion and motivation, little research has been conducted on individuals' "in-the-moment" feelings of shame (i.e., state shame). However, researching state shame is challenging because individuals may deny or underreport their feelings of shame, tend to self-isolate when they feel shame, and may be unwilling or unable to express themselves when feeling shame. The Experiential Shame Scale (ESS), an "opaque" measure of physical, emotional, and social markers of shame experiences, was developed to address the difficulties of assessing state shame. Evidence obtained in three studies of individuals' emotional reactions following personally important exam feedback suggests that students' ESS ratings were uniquely related to feelings of state shame and not to state guilt. Findings also reveal that state shame is specifically related to feelings of shock and not surprise. As intended, findings suggested that the ESS has low face validity and is not related to social desirability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223980.2013.818927

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, J. E.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Turner, Jeannine E.
Venue
The Journal of Psychology
Published
2014-02-05
Volume
148
Issue
5
Pages
577-601
ISSN
  • 0022-3980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1019
OpenAlex
W1977073623
Cited by
52
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
self-isolation, shock, surprise, exam feedback, students, social desirability, face validity
MeSH terms
Adult, Educational Measurement, Female, Humans, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Shame, Reproducibility of Results, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review