Cited by 58Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The Role of Social Approach and Avoidance Motives for Subjective Well‐Being and the Successful Transition to Adulthood

Open access
Nikitin, Jana, Freund, Alexandra M.·2008·Applied Psychology

Abstract

Social affiliation appears to be a central human need. Taking a developmental perspective, we discuss whether and how the desire to belong (approach motivation) and the fear of being rejected (avoidance motivation) might be of central importance for understanding success or failure in transitional phases, especially in the transition from adolescence into adulthood. Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral consequences of social motives (approach, avoidance, and their co‐occurrence) are reviewed. We argue that both tendencies need to be taken into account for understanding affiliation motivation and behavior and its significance for life satisfaction and well‐being. A predominant social approach motivation has positive consequences for cognition, behavior, emotion, and well‐being, whereas the opposite pattern holds for a predominant avoidance motivation. Co‐occurrence of both is characterised by ambivalent cognitions and emotions, and unstable behavior. Taking a developmental perspective, however, and considering social development in the transition to adulthood, co‐occurrence might be more beneficial than a predominant avoidance motivation. Il est clair que l’affiliation est un besoin humain fondamental. On se demande, dans une perspective développementale, si et comment le désir d’être accueilli (motivation à l’approche) et la crainte d’être rejeté (motivation à l’évitement) pourraient être d’une importance majeure dans l’explication du succès ou de l’échec des périodes de tran…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00356.x

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikitin, J., & Freund, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Nikitin, Jana
  • Freund, Alexandra M.
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06-28
Volume
57
Issue
s1
Pages
90-111
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
OpenAlex
W2068600667
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
social affiliation, fear of rejection, coming of age, adolescence, subjective well-being, life satisfaction, emotional ambivalence, social development (developmental psychology), developmental perspective, rejection sensitivity, self-concept, self-esteem, self-concept stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review