Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infiltration of tumour‐associated macrophages in prostate biopsy specimens is predictive of disease progression after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer

Nonomura, Norio, Takayama, Hitoshi, Nakayama, Masashi, Nakai, Yasutomo, Kawashima, Atsunari, Mukai, Masatoshi, Nagahara, Akira, Aozasa, Katsuyuki, Tsujimura, Akira·2011·BJU International

Abstract

Study Type – Prognostic (case series) Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? In general, tumour‐associated macrophage (TAM) is important for tumour progression including prostate cancer. In this paper, we clarified the usefulness of TAM in prostate biopsy specimens for predicting prognosis after hormonal therapy. OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate tumour‐associated macrophage (TAM) infiltration in prostate biopsy specimens as a possible prognostic factor for prostate cancer (PCa) after hormonal therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • Immunostaining of TAMs in prostate biopsy specimens was performed using a monoclonal antibody CD68 for 71 patients having PCa treated with hormonal therapy. • Six microscopic (×400) fields around the cancer foci were selected for TAM counting. RESULTS: • The median value of serum prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) was 50.1 ng/mL, and the median TAM count was 22. • Recurrence‐free survival was significantly better in patients with fewer TAMs (<22) than in those with higher numbers of TAMs (≥22) ( P < 0.001). • TAM count was higher in those with higher serum PSA (PSA), higher Gleason score, clinical T stage or those with PSA failure. Cox multivariate analysis showed that TAM count is one of the prognostic factors for PCa treated by hormonal therapy ( P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: • TAM infiltration in prostate needle biopsy specimens is a useful predictive factor for PSA failure or progression of PCa after hormonal therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09804.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
Nonomura, N., Takayama, H., Nakayama, M., Nakai, Y., Kawashima, A., Mukai, M., Nagahara, A., Aozasa, K., & Tsujimura, A.
Venue
BJU International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-02
Volume
107
Issue
12
Pages
1918-1922
ISSN
  • 1464-4096 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-410X
OpenAlex
W1528863334
Cited by
197
References
2
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infiltration of tumour‐associated macrophages in prostate biopsy specimens is predictive of disease progression after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09804.x
The paper
Nonomura, N., Takayama, H., Nakayama, M., Nakai, Y., Kawashima, A., Mukai, M., Nagahara, A., Aozasa, K., & Tsujimura, A. (2011). Infiltration of tumour‐associated macrophages in prostate biopsy specimens is predictive of disease progression after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. BJU International. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2010.09804.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.