Cited by 118Body Composition Measurement TechniquesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases

Association of simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat and the metabolic syndrome in male Caucasian and Indo‐Asian subjects

Valsamakis, G., Chetty, R., Anwar, A., Banerjee, A. K., Barnett, A., Kumar, S.·2004·Diabetic Medicine

Abstract

Aims The aims of this study were first, to investigate the relationship between simple anthropometric measures of obesity with visceral fat as assessed by a single slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐scan in patients attending a hospital clinic. Second, to determine which anthropometric measure best relates to the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome. Methods Forty‐one male subjects [body mass index (BMI): 30.2 + 5.8 kg/m 2, age: 50.3 + 13.6 years] were studied by MRI‐scan to measure visceral fat at L4/L5 level and to investigate its relationship with simple anthropometric measures. Second, we studied 83 male subjects to determine which anthropometric measure best predicts the metabolic complications (using the ATPIII criteria) of obesity in the setting of a hospital clinic. Results Waist circumference was the best anthropometric measurement that correlated with MRI‐visceral fat mass assessed at L4/L5 in 41 subjects who had an MRI scan (P = 0.0001, r2 = 0.36, beta = 0.56) amongst variables which also included age, BMI, sagittal diameter, diabetes and ethnicity. Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed sagittal diameter (P = 0.001, r2 = 0.4, beta = 0.406), age (P = 0.003, beta = 0.271) and waist circumference (P = 0.012, beta = 0.297) were the best predictors of the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome in all 83 male subjects amongst BMI, waist–hip ratio (WHR), ethnicity and diabetes‐related factors. Conclusions Waist circumference is a simple anthropometric parameter that best correlates with single slice MRI‐scan, but sagittal diameter (measured using abdominal calipers) better predicts the adverse metabolic profile of the metabolic syndrome. Although there is considerable variation in abdominal fat topography between ethnic groups, and also within populations, sagittal diameter assessment is a technique that is simple and best predicts the metabolic syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2004.01361.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valsamakis, G., Chetty, R., Anwar, A., Banerjee, A. K., Barnett, A., & Kumar, S.
Affiliations
  • Heartlands Hospital (GB)
  • Walsall Manor Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Kumar, S.
Venue
Diabetic Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11-24
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1339-1345
ISSN
  • 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5491
OpenAlex
W2044783290
Cited by
118
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • World Health Organization
  • Servier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
Keywords
obesity, visceral fat, metabolic syndrome, anthropometric measures, waist circumference, sagittal diameter, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, abdominal MRI, ethnic differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Body Constitution, United Kingdom, Humans, India, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Metabolic Syndrome, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review