The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The metabolic syndrome and incidence of cardiovascular disease in non‐diabetic subjects—a population‐based study comparing three different definitions
Open accessAbstract
Aims Between 1998 and 2005, a number of definitions of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) have been proposed. The aim of this population‐based cohort study was to compare prevalence rates and the prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) using different definitions of MetS. Methods A total of 5047 non‐diabetic subjects (66% women), from the city of Malmö, Sweden, were followed. The incidence of fatal and non‐fatal CVD (cardiac events, n = 176, and stroke, n = 171) was monitored over 11 years of follow‐up. MetS was defined in three different ways [by International Diabetes Federation (IDF), National Cholesterol Education Program—Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP‐ATPIII), or European Group for the study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR) criteria] based on data on waist circumference, blood pressure, serum triglycerides, High‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and fasting blood glucose. The IDF definition identified 21.9% of the subjects having the MetS. Corresponding figures for the NCEP‐ATPIII and EGIR definitions were 20.7 and 18.8%, respectively. Results After taking age, gender, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and lifestyle factors into account, the hazard ratio (HR) for CVD event according to the IDF, NCEP‐ATPIII and EGIR definitions were HR 1.11 (95% CI: 0.86–1.44), 1.59 (1.25–2.03) and 1.35 (1.05–1.74), respectively. The results were largely similar for cardiac and stroke events. Conclusions The prevalence of Mets according to the IDF definition was higher in comparison with NCEP‐ATPIII and EGIR definitions, but the IDF definition was not superior to these definitions for prediction of CVD events. This was true for both genders and questions the usefulness of the current IDF criteria of MetS in a North‐European, Caucasian population. In addition, single risk factors such as smoking had an equal prediction as the metabolic syndrome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Matthews, D. R., Hosker, J. P., Rudenski, A. S., Naylor, B. A., Treacher, D. F., & Turner, R. C. (1985) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/bf00280883 · Cited by 31,502
Grundy, S. M., Cleeman, J. I., Daniels, S. R., Donato, K. A., Eckel, R. H., Franklin, B. A., Gordon, D. J., Krauss, R. M., Savage, P. J., Smith, S. C., et al. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.169404 · Cited by 11,961
Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories
Wilson, P. W. F., D’Agostino, R. B., Levy, D., Belanger, A. M., Silbershatz, H., & Kannel, W. B. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1837 · Cited by 9,581
The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition
Alberti, K. G. M., Zimmet, P., & Shaw, J. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67402-8 · Cited by 9,352
The metabolic syndrome and total and cardiovascular disease mortality in middle-aged men
Lakka, H.-M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.21.2709 · Cited by 5,033
Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Associated With the Metabolic Syndrome
Isomaa, B., Almgren, P., Tuomi, T., Forsén, B., Lahti, K., Nissén, M., Taskinen, M.-R., & Groop, L. (2001) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.24.4.683 · Cited by 4,760
Comment on the provisional report from the WHO consultation
(1999) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1464-5491.1999.00059.x · Cited by 1,820
Grundy, S. M., Cleeman, J. I., Daniels, S. R., Donato, K. A., Eckel, R. H., Franklin, B. A., Gordon, D. J., Krauss, R. M., Savage, P. J., Smith, S. C., et al. (2005) · Cardiology in Review · doi:10.1097/01.crd.0000380842.14048.7e · Cited by 1,600
Stern, M. P., Williams, K., González-Villalpando, C., Hunt, K. J., & Haffner, S. M. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.11.2676 · Cited by 735
Cheal, K. L., Abbasi, F., Lamendola, C., McLaughlin, T., Reaven, G. M., & Ford, E. S. (2004) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.53.5.1195 · Cited by 312
Cited by
(2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht151 · Cited by 13,655
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Self-citationThe Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Risk
Mottillo, S., Filion, K. B., Genest, J., Joseph, L., Pilote, L., Poirier, P., Rinfret, S., Schiffrin, E. L., & Eisenberg, M. J. (2010) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.034 · Cited by 3,009
Cornier, M.-A., Dabelea, D., Hernandez, T. L., Lindstrom, R. C., Steig, A. J., Stob, N. R., Van Pelt, R. E., Wang, H., & Eckel, R. H. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0024 · Cited by 2,162
Huang, Y., Cai, X., Mai, W., Li, M., & Hu, Y. (2016) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.i5953 · Cited by 1,012
Metadata
- Authors
- Nilsson, P. M., Engström, G., & Hedblad, B.
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-22
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 464-472
- ISSN
- 0742-3071 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5491
- OpenAlex
- W2089602295
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 17.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The metabolic syndrome and incidence of cardiovascular disease in non‐diabetic subjects—a population‐based study comparing three different definitions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02142.x
- The paper
- Nilsson, P. M., Engström, G., & Hedblad, B. (2007). The metabolic syndrome and incidence of cardiovascular disease in non‐diabetic subjects—a population‐based study comparing three different definitions. Diabetic Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02142.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
