The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ON THE NATURE OF INTERLANGUAGE SYSTEMS
Abstract
This paper argues that the Interlanguage Hypothesis, as it is currently stated, lacks clear definitions of some of its most important characteristics. The central characteristics of ILs are examined. It is suggested that interlanguages (ILs) are natural languages, in the obvious sense, but that their grammar is peculiar in being permeable. This permeability of ILs explains why learners can transfer grammatical properties from their native language and why they can generalize or otherwise distort target language properties in an effort to communicate. Accepting this view of ILs forces the researcher to gather specific and copious data to support the hypotheses which may be proposed concerning the grammatical intuitions of any IL speaker. The relevance of this proposal to research strategies and the advantages of research with a more explicit notion of ILs are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Adjemian (1976) pointed out that interlanguage is peculiar in being permeable.”
From Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels (2021) · cites this paper as Adjemian (1976)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Cancino Herlinda, 1974, Testing hypotheses about second language acquisition, Working Papers on Bilingualism, 3, 80
- Corder S. P., 1973, Errata: Papers in Error Analysis
- Dickerson Lonna J., 1975, The learner's interlanguage as a variable rule system
- 10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1975.tb00114.x · DOI
- Tarone Elaine, 1976, Papers in Second Language Acquisition (Special Issue No. 4, Language Learning)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Typological characteristics of interlanguage: Across native language types and L2 proficiency levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., & Yu, Q. (2021) · Lingua · doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103085 · Cited by 9
Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels
Hao, Y., Wang, X., Wu, M., & Liu, H. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 · Cited by 8
“Adjemian (1976) pointed out that interlanguage is peculiar in being permeable.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Adjemian, C.
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1976-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 297-320
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2050448733
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 24.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and Language Analysis
- Keywords
- interlanguage, grammatical transfer, second language acquisition, research strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review