Cited by 29Second Language Acquisition and LearningEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

Linguistic complexity as the predictor of EFL independent and integrated writing quality

Zhang, Yujie, Ouyang, Jinghui·2023·Assessing Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.asw.2023.100727

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These theoretical predictions regarding syntactic and lexical profiles have been consistently supported by corpus-based studies of EFL academic writing.

    “These theoretical predictions regarding syntactic and lexical profiles have been consistently supported by corpus-based studies of EFL academic writing”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ouyang, Jinghui
Venue
Assessing Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-04
Volume
56
Pages
100727
ISSN
1075-2935 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4367323395
Cited by
28
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8
FWCI
13.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessing Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
linguistic complexity, EFL writing, independent writing, integrated writing, syntactic complexity, lexical complexity, writing genres, intermediate learners, writing assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review