Cited by 394EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningSubtitles and Audiovisual Media

Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task

Qi, Donald S., Lapkin, Sharon·2001·Journal of Second Language Writing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00046-7

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The quality of noticing, related to the depth of processing feedback, is a key factor in improvement in students' revisions.

    “In their study of two L2 writers' engagement with teacher feedback given as reformulations, for example, Qi and Lapkin (2001) argue that the quality of noticing, related to the depth of processing feedback, is a key factor in improvement in students' revisions.”

    From Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing (2018) · cites this paper as Qi and Lapkin (2001)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Qi, Donald S.
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
277-303
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045636994
Cited by
383
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 24
FWCI
31.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Subtitles and Audiovisual Media
Keywords
noticing, second language writing, reformulation, composing, feedback processing, second language proficiency, ESL learners, writing instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review