The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CULTURAL CHANGE: AN INTEGRATION OF THREE DIFFERENT VIEWS[1]
Abstract
In this article we integrate three disparate views of culture and cultural change. With each view comes a distinct set of implications about the nature, scope, source(s), and consequences of culture change. Each view also suggests distinct implications for those who wish to manage cultural change in organizations. We argue that to understand how organizations change, in general, it is important to understand these disparate, yet interrelated processes of cultural change. We present these three views of culture and cultural change processes in organizations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226550 · Cited by 28,308
Kytle, J., & Bandura, A. (1978) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065952 · Cited by 25,422
The Social Construction of Reality
Rose, D. M., Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/323448 · Cited by 13,820
Research in Organizational Behavior
Hammer, E. R., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1984) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258300 · Cited by 10,806
(1969) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 10,735
Organizational Culture and Leadership
Tierney, W. G., & Schein, E. H. (1986) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258322 · Cited by 9,601
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 7,939
A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392088 · Cited by 7,917
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm
Day, R. H., Cyert, R. M., March, J. G., Clarkson, Cohen, Feigenbaum, D., Greenberg, Moore, Soelberg, Starbuck, et al. (1964) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913056 · Cited by 7,791
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Hall, M. B., & Kuhn, T. S. (1963) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1847040 · Cited by 7,479
Cited by
Orlikowski, W. J. (1993) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249774 · Cited by 1,512
Competition, Cooperation, and the Search for Economic Rents: A Syncretic Model
Lado, A. A., Boyd, N. G., & Hanlon, S. C. (1997) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259226 · Cited by 981
Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change
Greve, H. R. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615139 · Cited by 771
Robey, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.167 · Cited by 765
Macrocultures: Determinants and Consequences
Abrahamson, E., & Fombrun, C. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1994.9412190217 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyerson, D., & Martin, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 623-647
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2142690099
- Cited by
- 655
- References
- 50
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CULTURAL CHANGE: AN INTEGRATION OF THREE DIFFERENT VIEWS[1]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00466.x
- The paper
- Meyerson, D., & Martin, J. (1987). CULTURAL CHANGE: AN INTEGRATION OF THREE DIFFERENT VIEWS[1]. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00466.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
