The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unpacking Commitment: Multiple Loyalties and Employee Behaviour*
Open accessAbstract
abstract We present findings from three UK studies on the nature and consequences of employees’ multiple commitments in the workplace, with samples drawn from private manufacturing, private services and the public sector. Co‐workers, the union, the union representative, customers, and the immediate boss emerge as separate foci of commitment, distinct from ‘global’ commitment to the organization as a whole. Consistent with social exchange theory, attitudinal and behavioural outcomes are predicted by commitment to those foci that might be expected to benefit from the outcome in question. There is evidence that global organizational commitment mediates the relationship between foci‐specific commitments and organization‐related outcomes, but there is no mediation in the case of those foci and outcomes that are more cognitively distant from the organization. A comparison of the studies suggests that the pattern and outcomes of commitment are influenced by the nature of the job and of the work context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., & Fetter, R. (1990) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7 · Cited by 5,628
Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents.
Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.68.4.653 · Cited by 4,043
Cited by
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013079 · Cited by 2,356
Front‐line managers as agents in the HRM‐performance causal chain: theory, analysis and evidence
Purcell, J., & Hutchinson, S. (2007) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00022.x · Cited by 928
Kuvaas, B. (2008) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00710.x · Cited by 488
Klein, H. J., Molloy, J. C., & Brinsfield, C. T. (2012) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0018 · Cited by 385
Satisfaction with HR practices and commitment to the organisation: why one size does not fit all
Kinnie, N., Hutchinson, S., Purcell, J., Rayton, B., & Swart, J. (2005) · Human Resource Management Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00293.x · Cited by 343
Metadata
- Authors
- Redman, T., & Snape, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Studies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-02-22
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 301-328
- ISSN
- 0022-2380 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6486
- OpenAlex
- W2126901004
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unpacking Commitment: Multiple Loyalties and Employee Behaviour*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00498.x
- The paper
- Redman, T., & Snape, E. (2005). Unpacking Commitment: Multiple Loyalties and Employee Behaviour*. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00498.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.