Some Determinants and Consequences of the Perception of Social Causality1
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Thibaut and Riecken (1955) found that a helper was liked less when he was of lower status than the recipient.
“Thibaut and Riecken (1955) manipulated the relative status of the helper and the recipient and found that the helper was liked less when he was of lower status than the recipient.”
From Suspicion and Dispositional Inference (1993) · cites this paper as Thibaut and Riecken (1955)
In both Thibaut and Riecken (1955) and Pruitt (1968), the presence of multiple causes led to less extreme inferences.
“In both cases, the presence of multiple causes (i.e., altruism and relatively low status in the case of Thibaut and Riecken; altruism and the availability of abundant resources in the case of Pruitt) led to less extreme inferences.”
From Suspicion and Dispositional Inference (1993) · cites this paper as Thibaut and Riecken (1955)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 6,982 · see citing works
The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process
Ross, L. (1977) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60357-3 · Cited by 4,170 · see citing works
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · see citing works
From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0 · Cited by 3,424 · see citing works
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0 · Cited by 1,783 · see citing works
The ‘ultimate attribution error’? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution
Hewstone, M. (1990) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420200404 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Suspicion and Dispositional Inference
Hilton, J. L., Fein, S., & Miller, D. T. (1993) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167293195003 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
- Authors
- THIBAUT, J. W., & RIECKEN, H. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1955-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-133
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1991108145
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 59.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- social causation, determinants of perception, causal attribution, social perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
