The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Self‐knowledge: An expanded view
Abstract
This paper argues for a more extensive study of self‐knowledge. From the cognitive perspective, self‐knowedge is a critical component of personality. Until quite recently, however, the study of self‐knowledge has been narrowly conceived, focusing primarily on how individuals describe their roles and characteristic behaviors. Yet individuals also have knowledge about their preferences and values, their goals and motives, and their rules and strategies for regulating behavior. These dynamic aspects of self‐knowledge are significant because they can be importantly revealing of future behavior. The content and organization of self‐knowledge is important first because it indicates which domains of behavior are regarded as the most self‐relevant. It is in these domains that the strongest links between personality and behavior will be observed. Second, self‐knowledge cognitively represents desired and undesired states for the self, as well as specific ideas about how to realize or avoid these states. It thus indicates the likely course of behavior in self‐relevant domains. A number of recent research efforts can be intepreted as explorations of self‐knowledge. These are briefly reviewed and integrated to provide a general outline for an expanded view of self‐knowledge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 2×
“And while its usefulness or veridicality is sometimes challenged (e.g., Bem, 1972; Nisbett & Wilson, 1977), there is little argument with the notion that selfknowledge is both highly available and easily accessible.”
BackgroundBem, D. J. (1972) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6 · Cited by 5,241
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1982) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.92.1.111 · Cited by 2,650
Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.38 · Cited by 555
Self-citation
Cited by
A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.2.256 · Cited by 9,745
Multidimensional Model of Racial Identity: A Reconceptualization of African American Racial Identity
Sellers, R. M., Smith, M. A., Shelton, J. N., Rowley, S. A. J., & Chavous, T. M. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_2 · Cited by 1,748
Sprott, D., Czellar, S., & Spangenberg, E. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.1.92 · Cited by 850
Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange.
Hermans, H. J. M. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.31 · Cited by 655
The symbolic self in evolutionary context
Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J. J. (1997) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_6 · Cited by 251
Metadata
- Authors
- Markus, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 543-565
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W2146547336
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐knowledge: An expanded view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00344.x
- The paper
- Markus, H. (1983). Self‐knowledge: An expanded view. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00344.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.