The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Dispositional and Situational Assessment of Children's Coping: Testing Alternative Models of Coping
Abstract
ABSTRACT Dispositional and situational measures of children's coping were developed using a theoretically based approach. Two studies (N 1 = 217; N 2 = 303) assessed the psychometric characteristics of these measures in fourth‐ through sixth‐grade children. Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that a four‐factor model of dispositional coping (active, distraction, avoidant, and support seeking) provided a better fit to the data than either the problemversus emotion‐focused (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984) or passive versus active (Billings & Moos, 1981) coping models. The four‐factor model was largely invariant with respect to age and gender. Moderate to high correlations were found between the parallel subscales of the dispositional and situational measures of coping. Although the four factor structures of the dispositional and situational measures were generally similar, factor loadings and correlations between dimensions were not equivalent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.1.150 · Cited by 4,845
Simultaneous Factor Analysis in Several Populations
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291366 · Cited by 2,051
Does coping help? A reexamination of the relation between coping and mental health
Aldwin, C. M., & Revenson, T. A. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.2.337 · Cited by 1,076
Stress and coping in early adolescence: Relationships to substance use in urban school samples.
Wills, T. A. (1986) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.5.6.503 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87 · Cited by 3,277
Skinner, E. A., Edge, K., Altman, J., & Sherwood, H. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.2.216 · Cited by 2,639
Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping
Tamres, L. K., Janicki, D., & Helgeson, V. S. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0601_1 · Cited by 2,044
Compas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., Williams, E., & Thigpen, J. C. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000110 · Cited by 1,555
“In addition to the three models of coping using CFA highlighted by Skinner et al. (2003) noted above (Ayers et al., 1996; Connor-Smith et al., 2000; Walker et al., 1997), two additional models of coping have been tested using CFA (Frydenberg & Lewis, 1993; Seiffge-Krenke, 1995).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRelations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis.
Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080 · Cited by 1,453
Metadata
- Authors
- Ayers, T. S., Sandier, I. N., West, S. G., & Roosa, M. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-12
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 923-958
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1983165042
- Cited by
- 639
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
