Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Self‐Compassion Versus Global Self‐Esteem: Two Different Ways of Relating to Oneself

Open access
Neff, Kristin D., Vonk, Roos·2009·Journal of Personality

Abstract

ABSTRACT This research examined self‐compassion and self‐esteem as they relate to various aspects of psychological functioning. Self‐compassion entails treating oneself with kindness, recognizing one's shared humanity, and being mindful when considering negative aspects of oneself. Study 1 (N=2,187) compared self‐compassion and global self‐esteem as they relate to ego‐focused reactivity. It was found that self‐compassion predicted more stable feelings of self‐worth than self‐esteem and was less contingent on particular outcomes. Self‐compassion also had a stronger negative association with social comparison, public self‐consciousness, self‐rumination, anger, and need for cognitive closure. Self‐esteem (but not self‐compassion) was positively associated with narcissism. Study 2 (N=165) compared global self‐esteem and self‐compassion with regard to positive mood states. It was found that the two constructs were statistically equivalent predictors of happiness, optimism, and positive affect. Results from these two studies suggest that self‐compassion may be a useful alternative to global self‐esteem when considering what constitutes a healthy self‐stance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Brandt A. C., 2006, Self‐esteem: Issues and answers, 224
  2. Campbell W. K., 2001, Blackwell handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2: Interpersonal processes, 437
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1190 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1190 · Paper page
  4. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.616 · DOI · Paper page
  5. McGregor I., The mask of zeal, Self and Identity
  6. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,234

Metadata

Authors
Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-29
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
23-50
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2065709018
Cited by
1,234
References
88
FWCI
17.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Self‐Compassion Versus Global Self‐Esteem: Two Different Ways of Relating to Oneself. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x
The paper
Neff, K. D., & Vonk, R. (2009). Self‐Compassion Versus Global Self‐Esteem: Two Different Ways of Relating to Oneself. Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.