Cited by 50Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Threat sensitivity, incentive sensitivity, and the experience of relief.

Carver, Charles S.·2009·Journal of Personality

Abstract

Relief is a positively valenced affect that occurs when a threat is removed or avoided. Among dimensional theories, this experience is accounted for by appealing to one of two different self-regulatory systems. Some hold that an approach system is responsible for all types of positively valenced affect, including this one. Others hold that an avoidance system is responsible for this particular positive affect. Two studies are reported (total N=422) that examined this issue, using a method in which individual differences in overall threat sensitivity and incentive sensitivity were assessed and related to responses to relief-related hypothetical scenarios. Threat sensitivity was the strongest positive correlate of relief in both studies. Reward responsiveness also related positively (independently) to relief. Fun seeking related inversely to relief. Discussion centers on theoretical implications of the findings for viewing effects of threat sensitivity, and on relations between dimensional and appraisal-based views of affective experience.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00540.x

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incentive salience may proactively facilitate action and engagement.

    “Thus incentive salience may proactively facilitate action and engagement (Ryan and Deci, 2000; Carver, 2009; Kruglanski et al., 2014).”

    From Evolving Concepts of Emotion and Motivation (2018) · cites this paper as Carver, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carver, C. S.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Carver, Charles S.
Venue
Journal of Personality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12-29
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
125-138
ISSN
  • 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-6494
OpenAlex
W2152075098
Cited by
50
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
relief, threat sensitivity, incentive sensitivity, reward responsiveness, fun seeking, self-regulation, positive affect, emotional experience, individual differences, appraisal theory of emotion
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Cognition, Escape Reaction, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Self Concept, Social Facilitation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review