The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Agency‐Communion and Self‐Esteem Relations Are Moderated by Culture, Religiosity, Age, and Sex: Evidence for the “Self‐Centrality Breeds Self‐Enhancement” Principle
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Who has high self-esteem? Is it ambitious, competitive, outgoing people-agentic personalities? Or is it caring, honest, understanding people-communal personalities? The literature on agency-communion and self-esteem is sparse, indirect, and inconsistent. Based on William James's theorizing, we propose the "self-centrality breeds self-enhancement" principle. Accordingly, agency will be linked to self-esteem, if agency is self-central. Conversely, communion will be linked to self-esteem, if communion is self-central. But what determines the self-centrality of agency and communion? The literature suggests that agency is self-central in agentic cultures, as well as among nonreligious individuals, men, and younger adults. Communion is self-central in communal cultures, as well as among religious individuals, women, and older adults. METHOD: This study examined 187,957 people (47% female; mean age = 37.49 years, SD = 12.22) from 11 cultures. The large sample size afforded us the opportunity to test simultaneously the effect of all four moderators in a single two-level model (participants nested in cultures). RESULTS: Results supported the unique moderating effect of culture, religiosity, age, and sex on the relation between agency-communion and self-esteem. CONCLUSIONS: Agentic and communal people can both have high self-esteem, depending on self-centrality of agency and communion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, Agency (a close relative of E) is more strongly linked to self-esteem than is Communion (a close relative of A) (Gebauer, Wagner et al., 2013;Gecas & Seff, 1989;Wojciszke et al., 2011).”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Gebauer, Wagner et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“They found a stronger agency-esteem relation with increasing country-level agency and a stronger communion-esteem relation with increasing country-level communion.”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Gebauer, Wagner, Sedikides, and Neberich (2013)
In the citing paper
“This in itself is a key extension of prior research on cultural norm-fulfillment because all prior research has relied exclusively on selfreports (Becker et al., 2004;Fulmer et al., 2010;Gebauer, Wagner et al., 2013;Goodwin et al., 2012).”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Gebauer, Wagner et al., 2013
Citations
Cites
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.2.224 · Cited by 21,995
Bhagat, R. S., & Hofstede, G. (2002) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389951 · Cited by 21,688
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5 · Cited by 16,280
(1973) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,144
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
(1999) · Cited by 7,995
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878 · Cited by 7,364
Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. (1999) · Cited by 6,830
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Hofstede G., 2001, Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations
- Raudenbush S. W., 1989, “Centering” predictors in multilevel analysis: Choices and consequences, Multilevel Modelling Newsletter, 1, 10
- Raudenbush S. W., 2004, HLM for Windows (Version 6.06)
- Sedikides C., 2007, The self: Frontiers in social psychology, 163
- Sedikides C., 2006, Evolution and social psychology: Frontiers in social psychology, 55
- Wiggins J. S., 1991, Thinking clearly about psychology: Personality and psychopathology, 89
- Wiggins J. S., 1995, Interpersonal Adjective Scale professional manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Age and gender differences in self-esteem—A cross-cultural window.
(2015) · doi:10.1037/pspp0000078 · Cited by 684
Self-citationCommunal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B. (2014) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7 · Cited by 669
Abele, A. E., Hauke-Forman, N., Peters, K., Louvet, E., Szymków, A., & Duan, Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01810 · Cited by 428
On the Importance of Being Moral: The Distinctive Role of Morality in Social Judgment
Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397 · Cited by 379
Self-Enhancement and Psychological Adjustment: A Meta-Analytic Review
Dufner, M., Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868318756467 · Cited by 279
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gebauer, J. E., Wagner, J., Sedikides, C., & Neberich, W.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Affinitas GmbH
- Corresponding author
- Gebauer, Jochen E.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-02-20
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-275
- ISSN
- 0022-3506 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-6494
- OpenAlex
- W1548902715
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 124
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 14.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- self-esteem, agency, communion, self-enhancement, culture, religiosity, age, sex differences, William James, cross-cultural comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Culture, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Religion, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Personal Autonomy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
