Cited by 669Social and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesPersonality Traits and Psychology

Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition

Abele, Andrea E., Wojciszke, Bogdan·2014·Advances in Experimental Social Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abele, A. E., & Wojciszke, B.
Affiliations
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Venue
Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2014
Pages
195-255
ISSN
0065-2601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2750388580
Cited by
669
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15
FWCI
231.17
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in experimental social psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
agency, communion, social cognition, self-perception, person perception, valence, interpersonal perception, competence, benevolence, trustworthiness, morality, assertiveness, decisiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review