The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa
Abstract
Public authority does not always fall within the exclusive realm of government institutions; in some contexts, institutional competition is intense and a range of ostensibly a-political situations become actively politicized. Africa has no shortage of institutions which attempt to exercise public authority: not only are multiple layers and branches of government institutions present and active to various degrees, but so-called traditional institutions bolstered by government recognition also vie for public authority, and new emerging institutions and organizations also enter the field. The practices of these institutions make concepts such as public authority, legitimacy, belonging, citizenship and territory highly relevant. This article proposes an analytical strategy for the understanding of public authority in such contexts. It draws on research from anthropologists, geographers, political scientists and social scientists working on Africa, in an attempt to explore a set of questions related to a variety of political practices and their institutional ramifications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Notes on the Difficulty of Studying the State (1977)
ABRAMS, P. (1988) · Journal of Historical Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.1988.tb00004.x · Cited by 2,463
Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research
Skocpol, T. (1985) · Bringing the State Back In · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628283.002 · Cited by 2,370
Cited by
New frontiers of land control: Introduction
Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607692 · Cited by 1,181
Self-citationReconfiguring frontier spaces: The territorialization of resource control
Rasmussen, M. B., & Lund, C. (2018) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.018 · Cited by 566
Self-citationNegotiating Statehood: Dynamics of Power and Domination in Africa
Hagmann, T., & Péclard, D. (2010) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01656.x · Cited by 499
Fragmented sovereignty: Land reform and dispossession in Laos
Lund, C. (2011) · Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2011.607709 · Cited by 276
Self-citationHybrid Political Order and the Politics of Uncertainty: Refugee Governance in Lebanon
Stel, N. (2020) · doi:10.4324/9780429434716 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Lund, C.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 685-705
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2009985411
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00497.x
- The paper
- Lund, C. (2006). Twilight Institutions: Public Authority and Local Politics in Africa. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00497.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.