Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On pedagogy

Gergely, György, Egyed, Katalin, Király, Ildikó·2007·Developmental Science

Abstract

Humans are adapted to spontaneously transfer relevant cultural knowledge to conspecifics and to fast‐learn the contents of such teaching through a human‐specific social learning system called ‘pedagogy’ (Csibra & Gergely, 2006). Pedagogical knowledge transfer is triggered by specific communicative cues (such as eye‐contact, contingent reactivity, the prosodic pattern of ‘motherese’, and being addressed by one's own name). Infants show special sensitivity to such ‘ostensive’ cues that signal the teacher's communicative intention to manifest new and relevant knowledge about a referent object. Pedagogy offers a novel functional perspective to interpret a variety of early emerging triadic communicative interactions between adults and infants about novel objects they are jointly attending to. The currently dominant interpretation of such triadic communications (mindreading) holds that infants interpret others’ object‐directed manifestations in terms of subjective mental states (such as emotions, dispositions, or intentions) that they attribute to the other person's mind. We contrast the pedagogical versus the mindreading account in a new study testing 14‐month‐olds’ interpretation of others’ object‐directed emotion expressions observed in a communicative cueing context. We end by discussing the far‐reaching implications of the pedagogical perspective for a wide range of early social‐cognitive competences, and for providing new directions for future research on child development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00576.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.011 · DOI
  2. 10.1207/s15516709cog2701_4 · DOI
  3. Csibra G., 2006, Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Attention and performance, 249, 10.1093/oso/9780198568742.003.0011 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/9780470996652.ch2 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00128-1 · DOI
  6. 10.1075/is.6.3.10ger · DOI · Paper page
  7. Gergely G., 2006, Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction, 229
  8. 10.1038/415755a · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00661-H · DOI
  10. 10.1017/CBO9780511752902.011 · DOI
  11. Liszkowski U., 2006, Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and interaction.
  12. 10.1111/1467-8624.00311 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/1467-8624.00532 · DOI
  14. 10.1126/science.1107621 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/0273-2297(86)90002-X · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00073-2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1037/0012-1649.33.1.12 · DOI
  18. 10.1207/s15327647jcd0503_1 · DOI
  19. Sperber D., 1986, Relevance: Communication and cognition
  20. 10.1017/S0140525X05000129 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/1469-7610.00701 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Gergely, G., Egyed, K., & Király, I.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-12-20
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
139-146
ISSN
  • 1363-755X
  • 1467-7687
Cited by
219
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review