The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Speech‐perception‐in‐noise deficits in dyslexia
Abstract
Speech perception deficits in developmental dyslexia were investigated in quiet and various noise conditions. Dyslexics exhibited clear speech perception deficits in noise but not in silence. Place‐of‐articulation was more affected than voicing or manner‐of‐articulation. Speech‐perception‐in‐noise deficits persisted when performance of dyslexics was compared to that of much younger children matched on reading age, underscoring the fundamental nature of speech‐perception‐in‐noise deficits. The deficits were not due to poor spectral or temporal resolution because dyslexics exhibited normal ‘masking release’ effects (i.e. better performance in fluctuating than in stationary noise). Moreover, speech‐perception‐in‐noise predicted significant unique variance in reading even after controlling for low‐level auditory, attentional, speech output, short‐term memory and phonological awareness processes. Finally, the presence of external noise did not seem to be a necessary condition for speech perception deficits to occur because similar deficits were obtained when speech was degraded by eliminating temporal fine‐structure cues without using external noise. In conclusion, the core deficit of dyslexics seems to be a lack of speech robustness in the presence of external or internal noise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.2.273 · Cited by 748
Self-citationDeficits in perceptual noise exclusion in developmental dyslexia.
Sperling, A. J., Lu, Z.-L., Manis, F. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2005) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1474 · Cited by 296
Cited by
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181cdb272 · Cited by 775
Learning to Read and Dyslexia: From Theory to Intervention Through Personalized Computational Models
Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., & Zorzi, M. (2020) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721420915873 · Cited by 68
Self-citationMusic, Noise-Exclusion, and Learning
Chandrasekaran, B., & Kraus, N. (2010) · Music Perception · doi:10.1525/mp.2010.27.4.297 · Cited by 63
Les outils numériques d’aide à l’apprentissage de la lecture
Lassault, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2018) · Langue française · doi:10.3917/lf.199.0111 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ziegler, J. C., Pech‐Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C.
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-08-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 732-745
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2143914672
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 36.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speech‐perception‐in‐noise deficits in dyslexia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00817.x
- The paper
- Ziegler, J. C., Pech‐Georgel, C., George, F., & Lorenzi, C. (2009). Speech‐perception‐in‐noise deficits in dyslexia. Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00817.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.