Cited by 26Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLiteracy and Educational PracticesEducational Methods and Media Use

Les outils numériques d’aide à l’apprentissage de la lecture

Open access
Lassault, Julie, Ziegler, Johannes Christoph·2018·Langue française

Abstract

La lecture est la colonne vertébrale de tous les apprentissages. Or, les études récentes de l’OCDE montrent que 40.5 % des élèves français de 15 ans ne maitrisent pas la lecture et que 21.5 % sont même en grande difficulté. Les écarts de niveau entre les élèves les plus performants et les moins performants sont en augmentation, au moins en France. Face à ce problème, le numérique peut offrir aujourd’hui des solutions « de première intention » au sein de l’école bien avant que l’enfant soit en échec. Dans cet article, nous faisons d’abord un point sur les logiciels d’aide à l’apprentissage de la lecture disponibles. Nous présentons ensuite les principes et l’implémentation du logiciel phare dans ce domaine : GraphoLearn. Ce logiciel finlandais, qui existe dans d’autres langues, a été récemment implémenté et validé pour le français.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3917/lf.199.0111

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For less transparent writing systems such as English and French, it is necessary to introduce and train mappings at various grain sizes including graphemes, syllables, rimes, whole words, and sentences.

    “it is necessary for the acquisition of less transparent writing systems (such as English and to a lesser extent French) to introduce and train these mappings at various grain sizes including graphemes, syllables, rimes, whole words and even sentences”

    From Testing the Effects of GraphoGame Against a Computer-Assisted Math Intervention in Primary School (2022) · cites this paper as Lassault & Ziegler, 2018

    Sections 3 and 4 describe training grapheme–phoneme correspondences in GraphoLearn and adding word- and sentence-construction exercises in its French version; the figure in Section 5 also shows a syllable exercise. The copy does not establish that all the listed grain sizes, particularly rimes, must be trained to acquire English or French reading. Its mention of a rhyme task in Section 2.2 does not make that broader necessity claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ABT C. C. (1987), Serious games, Washington (DC), University Press of America.
  2. BILLARD C. et al. (2009), "Deficits in reading acquisition in primary school: Cognitive, social, and behavioral factors studied in a sample of 1062 children", Revue d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 57 (3), 191-203.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lassault, J., & Ziegler, J. C.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
Langue française
Publisher
CAIRN.INFO
Published
2018-08-29
Volume
N° 199
Issue
3
Pages
111-121
ISSN
0023-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889266573
Cited by
26
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Locations
  • Langue française (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Methods and Media Use
Keywords
reading acquisition, digital learning tools, reading difficulties, educational software, early intervention, educational technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review