Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference
Abstract
Adults refer young children’s attention to things in two basic ways: through the use of pointing (and other deictic gestures) and words (and other linguistic conventions). In the current studies, we referred young children (2‐ and 4‐year‐olds) to things in conflicting ways, that is, by pointing to one object while indicating linguistically (in some way) a different object. In Study 1, a novel word was put into competition with a pointing gesture in a mutual exclusivity paradigm; that is, with a known and a novel object in front of the child, the adult pointed to the known object (e.g. a cup) while simultaneously requesting ‘the modi’. In contrast to the findings of Jaswal and Hansen (2006), children followed almost exclusively the pointing gesture. In Study 2, when a known word was put into competition with a pointing gesture – the adult pointed to the novel object but requested ‘the car’– children still followed the pointing gesture. In Study 3, the referent of the pointing gesture was doubly contradicted by the lexical information – the adult pointed to a known object (e.g. a cup) but requested ‘the car’– in which case children considered pointing and lexical information equally strong. Together, these findings suggest that in disambiguating acts of reference, young children at both 2 and 4 years of age rely most heavily on pragmatic information (e.g. in a pointing gesture), and only secondarily on lexical conventions and principles.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children can use gaze direction, body orientation, and index‐finger pointing as cues to map words onto objects.
“Children can use gaze direction, body orientation, and index‐finger pointing as cues to map words onto objects (e.g., Baldwin et al., 1996; Grassmann & Tomasello, 2010; Kory Westlund et al., 2017; Verhagen et al., 2019).”
From The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Grassmann & Tomasello, 2010
Naming combined with a nonverbal cue toward or with the object could reduce the referential ambiguity in the learning context.
“In addition, naming combined with a nonverbal cue toward or with the object could reduce the referential ambiguity in the learning context (Baldwin et al., 1996; Grassmann & Tomasello, 2010; Kory Westlund et al., 2017; Verhagen et al., 2019).”
From The role of dyadic combinations of infants' behaviors and caregivers' verbal and multimodal responses in predicting vocabulary outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as Grassmann & Tomasello, 2010
Cites
Social cognition, joint attention, and communicative competence from 9 to 15 months of age.
Carpenter, M., Nagell, K., Tomasello, M., Butterworth, G., & Moore, C. (1998) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166214 · Cited by 2,727 · see citing works
Self-citationTomasello, M., Carpenter, M., & Liszkowski, U. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01025.x · Cited by 1,039 · see citing works
Self-citationInfants' Reliance on a Social Criterion for Establishing Word-Object Relations
Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., Bill, B., Desjardins, R. N., Irwin, J. M., & Tidball, G. (1996) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131771 · Cited by 398 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
van der Klis, A., Adriaans, F., & Kager, R. (2023) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2023.101828 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
van der Klis, A., Junge, C., Adriaans, F., & Kager, R. (2025) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12626 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Children can use gaze direction, body orientation, and index‐finger pointing as cues to map words onto objects (e.g., Baldwin et al., 1996; Grassmann & Tomasello, 2010; Kory Westlund et al., 2017; Verhagen et al., 2019).”
- Authors
- Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Grassmann, Susanne
- Venue
- Developmental Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-12-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 252-263
- ISSN
- 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7687
- OpenAlex
- W2169845799
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- pointing gestures, mutual exclusivity, pragmatic interpretation, young children, referential language
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Attention, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Concept Formation, Conflict, Psychological, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Female, Gestures, Humans, Infant, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Vocabulary, Recognition, Psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review