Cited by 131Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentLanguage Development and DisordersCategorization, perception, and language

Young children follow pointing over words in interpreting acts of reference

Grassmann, Susanne, Tomasello, Michael·2010·Developmental Science

Abstract

Adults refer young children’s attention to things in two basic ways: through the use of pointing (and other deictic gestures) and words (and other linguistic conventions). In the current studies, we referred young children (2‐ and 4‐year‐olds) to things in conflicting ways, that is, by pointing to one object while indicating linguistically (in some way) a different object. In Study 1, a novel word was put into competition with a pointing gesture in a mutual exclusivity paradigm; that is, with a known and a novel object in front of the child, the adult pointed to the known object (e.g. a cup) while simultaneously requesting ‘the modi’. In contrast to the findings of Jaswal and Hansen (2006), children followed almost exclusively the pointing gesture. In Study 2, when a known word was put into competition with a pointing gesture – the adult pointed to the novel object but requested ‘the car’– children still followed the pointing gesture. In Study 3, the referent of the pointing gesture was doubly contradicted by the lexical information – the adult pointed to a known object (e.g. a cup) but requested ‘the car’– in which case children considered pointing and lexical information equally strong. Together, these findings suggest that in disambiguating acts of reference, young children at both 2 and 4 years of age rely most heavily on pragmatic information (e.g. in a pointing gesture), and only secondarily on lexical conventions and principles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00871.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grassmann, S., & Tomasello, M.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Grassmann, Susanne
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12-09
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
252-263
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W2169845799
Cited by
131
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
pointing gestures, mutual exclusivity, pragmatic interpretation, young children, referential language
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Attention, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Concept Formation, Conflict, Psychological, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Female, Gestures, Humans, Infant, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Reference Values, Vocabulary, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review