Cited by 398Language Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCategorization, perception, and language

Infants' Reliance on a Social Criterion for Establishing Word-Object Relations

Baldwin, Dare A., Markman, Ellen M., Bill, Brigitte, Desjardins, Renee N., Irwin, Jane M., Tidball, Glynnis·1996·Child Development

Abstract

The language children hear presents them with a multitude of co-occurrences between words and things in the world, and they must repeatedly determine which among these manifold co-occurrences is relevant. Social factors--such as cues regarding the speaker's referential intent--might serve as one guide to whether word-object covariation should be registered. In 2 studies, infants (15-20 months and 18-20 months in Studies 1 and 2, respectively) heard novel labels at a time when they were investigating a single novel object; in one case the label was uttered by a speaker seated within the infant's view and displaying concurrent attention to the novel toy (coupled condition), whereas in the other case the label emanated from a speaker seated out of the infant's view (decoupled condition). In both studies, subsequent comprehension questions indicated that infants of 18-20 months registered a stable link between label and object in the coupled conditions, but not in the decoupled condition, despite the fact that covariation between label and object was equivalent in the 2 conditions. Thus, by 18-20 months children are inclined to establish a mapping between word and object only when a speaker displays signs of referring to that object.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/1131771

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldwin, D. A., Markman, E. M., Bill, B., Desjardins, R. N., Irwin, J. M., & Tidball, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Oregon (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
Child Development
Published
1996-12
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
3135
ISSN
0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105751169
Cited by
398
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
word-object mapping, infant language acquisition, social cues, word learning, novel labels, covariation, joint attention
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Child Development, Psychology, Child, Cognition, Concept Formation, Humans, Infant, Infant Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review