Cited by 287Infant Development and Preterm CareDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive Abilities and Testing

Modeling a cascade of effects: the role of speed and executive functioning in preterm/full-term differences in academic achievement: Executive function in preterm adolescents

Open access
Rose, Susan A., Feldman, Judith F., Jankowski, Jeffery J.·2011·Developmental Science

Abstract

This study identified deficits in executive functioning in pre-adolescent preterms and modeled their role, along with processing speed, in explaining preterm/full-term differences in reading and mathematics. Preterms (< 1750 g) showed deficits at 11 years on a battery of tasks tapping the three basic executive functions identified by Miyake - updating/working memory, inhibition, and shifting. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that these executive functions, though correlated, were distinct from one another and from processing speed, which later proved to account for much of the intercorrelation among executive functions. In the best-fitting structural equation model, the negative effects of prematurity on achievement were completely mediated by the three executive functions and speed in a cascade of effects: prematurity → slower processing speed → poorer executive functioning (working memory) → lower achievement in math and reading.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01068.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The general unity/diversity pattern has been consistently found in other samples, including children, young adults, and older adults.

    “This general unity/diversity pattern has been consistently found in other samples, including children (e.g., Lehto et al., 2003; Rose et al., 2011), young adults (Miyake et al., 2000), and older adults (e.g., Vaughan and Giovanello, 2010), although only a single unitary factor (e.g., Wiebe et al., 2008, 2011) or two factors (Miller et al., 2012a) may be evident in preschool children.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Agostino, A., Johnson, J., & Pascual-Leone, J. (2010). Execu- tive functions underlying multiplicative reasoning: problem type matters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 286-305.
  2. Susan A. Rose et al. Ó 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 14677687, 2011, 5, · DOI
  3. Conway, A.R.A., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F., Hambrick, D.Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R.W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769-786.
  4. Cowan, N. (1997). The development of memory in childhood. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
  5. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P.A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450-466.
  6. DeFries, J.C., & Plomin, R. (1985). Origins of individual dif- ferences in infancy: The Colorado Adoption Project. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  7. Engle, R.W., Tuholski, S.W., Laughlin, J.E., & Conway, A.R.A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309-331.
  8. Johnson, C., Hennessy, E., Smith, R., Trikic, R., Wolke, D., & Marlow, N. (2010). Academic attainment and special edu- cation needs in extremely preterm children at 11 years of age: the EPICure study. Archives of Disease in Childhood -Fetal Neonatal Edition, 94, F283-F289.
  9. Ó 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 14677687, 2011, 5, · DOI
  10. Lee, K., Ng, E.L., & Ng, S.F. (2009). The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 373-387.
  11. McCormick, M.C. (1989). Long-term follow-up of infants discharged from neonatal intensive care units. Journal of the American Medical Association, 261, 1767-1772.
  12. Mulder, H., Pitchford, N.J., Hagger, M.S., & Marlow, N. (2009). Development of executive function and attention in preterm children: a systematic review. Developmental Neuro- psychology, 34, 393-421.
  13. Mulder, H., Pitchford, N.J., & Marlow, N. (2010). Processing speed and working memory underlie academic attainment in very preterm children. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal Neonatal Edition, 95, F267-F272.
  14. Passolunghi, M.C., & Siegel, L.S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory, and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving. Journal of Experi- mental Child Psychology, 80, 44-57.
  15. Reitan, R.M., & Wolfson, D. (1992). Neurospychological eval- uation of older children. Yuscon, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
  16. Soria-Pastor, S., GimØnez, M., Narberhaus, A., Falcon, C., Botet, F., Bargalló, N., Mercader, J.M., & JunquØ, C. (2008). Patterns of cerebral white matter damage and cognitive impairment in adolescents born very preterm. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 26, 647-654.
  17. Swanson, H.J. (2006). Cross-sectional and incremental changes in working memory and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 265-281.
  18. Taylor, H.G., Minich, N., Bangert, B., Filipek, P.A., & Hack, M.B. (2004). Long-term neuropsychological outcomes of very low birth weight: associations with early risks for peri- ventricular brain insults. Journal of the International Neuro- psychological Society, 10, 987-1004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, S. A., Feldman, J. F., & Jankowski, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Rose, Susan A.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-13
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
1161-1175
ISSN
1363-755X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161409502
Cited by
287
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
15.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 13810, R01HD013810, R01HD049494, HD 049494)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
preterm birth, executive function, processing speed, academic performance, reading achievement, mathematics achievement, working memory, inhibition, cognitive flexibility, mediation, preadolescents, low birth weight
MeSH terms
Achievement, Attention, Birth Order, Child, Cognition, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review