Cited by 180Obesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity and Health Practices

Self-esteem and cognitive development in the era of the childhood obesity epidemic

Open access
Wang, F., Veugelers, P. J.·2008·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Consequences of obesity for mental health and cognitive development are not established to the same degree as those for chronic diseases. This study aims to document the interrelationships between body weight, self-esteem and school performance in childhood. Height and weight measurements and self-report of self-esteem, diet quality and physical activity of 4945 grade 5 students were linked with standardized literacy test results. Structural equation models were applied to confirm hypothesized relationships between body weight, self-esteem and school performance, and revealed that body weight affected self-esteem negatively and that school performance affected self-esteem positively. Body weight did not affect school performance, and self-esteem did affect neither body weight nor school performance. Subsequent multi-level logistic regression showed that obese students, relative to normal weight students, were more likely (1.44; 95% CI: 1.12-1.84), and students with good school performance, relative to those performing poor, were less likely (0.39; 95% CI: 0.26-0.58), to have low self-esteem. Diet quality and active living had positive effects on both school performance and self-esteem. The study findings further establish obesity as a risk factor for low self-esteem and add to the rationale to promote healthy eating and active living among children and youth as this will prevent chronic diseases and improve mental health and cognitive development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2008.00507.x

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, F., & Veugelers, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Veugelers, P. J.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10-15
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
615-623
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1979666501
Cited by
180
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
childhood obesity, self-esteem, cognitive development, academic performance, body weight, diet quality, physical activity, literacy achievement, mental health, healthy eating, active lifestyle, chronic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Body Weight, Child, Child Development, Cognition, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Male, Nova Scotia, Obesity, Schools, Self Concept, Students, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review