Cited by 233Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

A new model of the role of psychological and emotional distress in promoting obesity: Conceptual review with implications for treatment and prevention

Hemmingsson, E.·2014·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

The lack of significant treatment and prevention progress highlights the need for a more expanded strategy. Given the robust association between socioeconomic factors and obesity, combined with new insights into how socioeconomic disadvantage affects both behaviour and biology, a new causal model is proposed. The model posits that psychological and emotional distress is a fundamental link between socioeconomic disadvantage and weight gain. At particular risk are children growing up in a disharmonious family environment, mainly caused by parental socioeconomic disadvantage, where they are exposed to parental frustrations, relationship discord, a lack of support and cohesion, negative belief systems, unmet emotional needs and general insecurity. Without adequate resilience, such experiences increase the risk of psychological and emotional distress, including low self-esteem and self-worth, negative emotions, negative self-belief, powerlessness, depression, anxiety, insecurity and a heightened sensitivity to stress. These inner disturbances eventually cause a psycho-emotional overload, triggering a cascade of weight gain-inducing effects including maladaptive coping strategies such as eating to suppress negative emotions, chronic stress, appetite up-regulation, low-grade inflammation and possibly reduced basal metabolism. Over time, this causes obesity, circular causality and further weight gain. Tackling these proposed root causes of weight gain could potentially improve both treatment and prevention outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/obr.12197

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological factors have been identified as an important target for selective prevention and treatment of obesity in adolescents and underweight adolescents.

    “Due to these multiple mental health concerns, psychological factors have been identified as an important target for selective prevention and treatment of obesity in adolescents [18] but also in underweight adolescents.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hemmingsson, E.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Hemmingsson, E.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-16
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
769-779
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1682015741
Cited by
233
References
126
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
psychological distress, emotional distress, obesity, socioeconomic deprivation, causal models, childhood family environment, low self-esteem, depression, anxiety, stress sensitivity, maladaptive coping, chronic stress, low-grade inflammation, basal metabolic rate, obesity prevention, obesity treatment
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Behavior Therapy, Diet, Emotions, Humans, Obesity, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Stress, Psychological, Weight Gain, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review