The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity and reliability of measures of television viewing time and other non‐occupational sedentary behaviour of adults: a review
Abstract
Summary: Time spent in non‐occupational sedentary behaviours (particularly television viewing time) is associated with excess adiposity and an increased risk of metabolic disorders among adults; however, there are no reviews of the validity and reliability of assessing these behaviours. This paper aims to document measures used to assess adults' time spent in leisure‐time sedentary behaviours and to review the evidence on their reliability and validity. Medline, CINAHL and Psych INFO databases and reference lists from published papers were searched to identify studies in which leisure‐time sedentary behaviours had been measured in adults. Sixty papers reporting measurement of at least one type of leisure‐time sedentary behaviour were identified. Television viewing time was the most commonly measured sedentary behaviour. The main method of data collection was by questionnaire. Nine studies examined reliability and three examined validity for the questionnaire method of data collection. Test–retest reliabilities were predominantly moderate to high, but the validity studies reported large differences in correlations of self‐completion questionnaire data with the various referent measures used. To strengthen future epidemiological and health behaviour studies, the development of reliable and valid self‐report instruments that cover the full range of leisure‐time sedentary behaviour is a priority.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salmon, J., Owen, N., Crawford, D., Bauman, A., & Sallis, J. F. (2003) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.178 · Cited by 915
Self-citationPhysical Activity and Television Watching in Relation to Risk for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Men
Hu, F. B., Leitzmann, M. F., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Willett, W. C., & Rimm, E. B. (2001) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.161.12.1542 · Cited by 828
Salmon, J., Bauman, A., Crawford, D., Timperio, A., & Owen, N. (2000) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0801203 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Too Much Sitting: The Population Health Science of Sedentary Behavior
Owen, N., Healy, G. N., Matthews, C. E., & Dunstan, D. W. (2010) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1097/jes.0b013e3181e373a2 · Cited by 2,202
Self-citationWilmot, E. G., Edwardson, C. L., Achana, F. A., Davies, M. J., Gorely, T., Gray, L. J., Khunti, K., Yates, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2012) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-012-2677-z · Cited by 1,789
Dunstan, D. W., Barr, E. L. M., Healy, G. N., Salmon, J., Shaw, J. E., Balkau, B., Magliano, D. J., Cameron, A. J., Zimmet, P. Z., & Owen, N. (2010) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.894824 · Cited by 825
Self-citationYoung, D. R., Hivert, M.-F., Alhassan, S., Camhi, S. M., Ferguson, J. F., Katzmarzyk, P. T., Lewis, C. E., Owen, N., Perry, C. K., Siddique, J., et al. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000440 · Cited by 791
Self-citationAmount of time spent in sedentary behaviors and cause-specific mortality in US adults
Matthews, C. E., George, S. M., Moore, S. C., Bowles, H. R., Blair, A., Park, Y., Troiano, R. P., Hollenbeck, A., & Schatzkin, A. (2012) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.019620 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Clark, B. K., Sugiyama, T., Healy, G. N., Salmon, J., Dunstan, D. W., & Owen, N.
- Venue
- Obesity Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-12-23
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-16
- ISSN
- 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-789X
- OpenAlex
- W2053196229
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
