CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 779

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

WHOSE WOODS ARE THESE? COUNTER‐MAPPING FOREST TERRITORIES IN KALIMANTAN, INDONESIA

Peluso, Nancy Lee·1995·Antipode
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

ABSTRACTS: This paper examines the politics of land and forest rights in Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo). Forest mapping by government forestry planners allocates rights of resource use and land access according to forest types and economic objectives, only rarely recognizing indigenous occupancy rights or forest territories customarily claimed or managed by local people. As maps and official plans based on them ignore, and in some cases criminalize, traditional rights to forest, forest products, and forest land for temporary conversion to swidden agriculture, indigenous activists are using sketch maps to re‐claim territories ‐ a process that requires re‐defining many traditional forest rights. The paper considers the political implications of mapping and the implications of a focus on land use rather than forest use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Aberley D., 1993, Boundaries of Home: Mapping for Local Empowerment
  2. Anderson B. R. O'G., 1991, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism
  3. Barber C. V., 1989, “The State, the Environment, and Development: The Genesis and Transformation of Social Forest Policy in New Order Indonesia
  4. Buisseret D., 1992, Monarchs, Ministers, and Maps: The Emergence of Cartography as a Tool of Government in Early Modern Europe
  5. Colfer C., 1983, Change and indigenous agroforestry in East Kalimantan, Borneo Research Bulletin, 15, 3
  6. Djajadiningrat S., 1990, Kualitas Lingkungan Indonesia 1990
  7. Fischer A., 1994, Power mapping: New ways of creating maps help people protect their landscapes, Utne Reader, 65, 32
  8. Fox J., 1990, Keepers of the Forest: Land Management Alternatives for Southeast Asia, 119
  9. Giddens A., 1984, The Constitution of Society
  10. Girot P., 1993, The geopolitics and ecopolitics of the Rio San Juan, Research and Exploration, 8, 52
  11. Government of Indonesia (GOI), Regional Physical Planning Programme for Transmigration (RePPProt)
  12. 10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7 · DOI
  13. Harahap, 1991, Pemanfaatan hutan dalam mensejahterakan masyarakat
  14. Harley J. B., 1988, The Iconography of Landscape, 277
  15. 10.3138/E635-7827-1757-9T53 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Harley J. B., 1992, History of Cartography
  17. Harvey D., 1989, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Change
  18. Hobsbawm E., 1983, The Invention of Tradition
  19. Holleman J. F., 1981, Van Vollenhoven on Indonesian Adat Law: Selections from “Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch‐Indie Vol. 1, 1918, 10.1007/978-94-017-5878-9 · DOI
  20. Jessup T., 1983, Why do shifting cultivators move, Borneo Research Bulletin, 13, 16
  21. 10.7208/chicago/9780226764634.001.0001 · DOI
  22. Kompas, 1993, Hutan Adat Jelmu Sibak Dijadikan HTI Trans
  23. Lefebvre H., 1991, The Production of Space
  24. Lev D., 1985, Colonial law and the genesis of the Indonesian State, 10.2307/3350875 · DOI
  25. Mackie C., 1986, “Disturbance and Succession Resulting from Shifting Cultivation in an Upland Rainforest in Indonesian Borneo
  26. 10.1080/00074917112331331902 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/S0026749X00010040 · DOI
  28. Momberg F., 1994, Paper presented at the Borneo Research Council Third Biennial International Conference
  29. Moniaga S., 1993, Legal Frameworks for Forest Management in Asia: Case Studies of Community/State Relations, 131
  30. Moore S. F., 1986, Social Facts and Fabrications: “Customary” Law on Kilimanjaro, 1880–1980
  31. Padoch C., 1994, Forest Resources and Wood‐Based Biomass Energy as Rural Development Assets, 307
  32. 10.1525/9780520915534 · DOI
  33. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.620210.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0959-3780(93)90006-7 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Peluso N. L., Borneo in Transition: People, Forests, Conservation, and Development
  36. Poffenberger M., 1990, Keepers of the Forest: Land Management Alternatives for Southeast Asia
  37. Potter L., 1995, Borneo in Transition: People, Forests, Conservation, and Development
  38. Pramono H., 1991, A Brief Review of Forest Land Use and Deforestation in Indonesia
  39. Sack R. D., 1983, Human Territorialty: Its Theory and History
  40. Sirait M., 1994, Mapping customary land in East Kalimantan, Indonesia, Ambio, 23, 411
  41. Smith N., 1984, Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space
  42. Soja E. W., 1989, Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory
  43. Vandergeest P.andN. L.Peluso(1995)Territorialization and the Thai State.Theory and Society(in press).
  44. Weinstock J. A., 1979, “Land tenure practices of the swidden cultivators of Borneo
  45. Wood D., 1992, The Power of Maps
  46. Woodward D., 1989, Geography's Inner Worlds
  47. Zerner C., 1990, Legal Options for the Indonesian Forestry Sector

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 779

Metadata

Authors
Peluso, N. L.
Venue
Antipode
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-10
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
383-406
ISSN
  • 0066-4812
  • 1467-8330
DOI
10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x
Cited by
779
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 3893 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review