Cited by 136Indigenous Cultures and HistoryHistorical Geography and CartographyIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Decolonizing the Map: Recentering Indigenous Mappings

Rose-Redwood, Reuben, Blu Barnd, Natchee, Lucchesi, Annita Hetoevėhotohke’e, Dias, Sharon, Patrick, Wil·2020·Cartographica

Abstract

For over five centuries, cartographic map-making has played a pivotal role as a political technology of empire-building, settler colonialism, and the dispossession of Indigenous lands. Yet Indigenous peoples themselves have long engaged in their own mapping practices to share ancestral knowledge, challenge colonial rule, and reclaim Indigenous "place-worlds." Although there is now a sizable body of scholarly literature on the mapping of empire, this special issue on "Decolonizing the Map" aims to recenter Indigenous mappings and decolonial cartographies as spatial practices of world-making. In this introductory article, we provide an overview of the theory and praxis of decolonial mapping and outline the key themes of the contributions to the present special issue. Drawing upon insights from this edited collection, we conclude that decolonial mapping requires a recentering of Indigenous geographical knowledge, respect for Indigenous protocols, and the active participation of Indigenous peoples in the mapping process itself if the project of decolonizing the map is to truly move beyond the colonial cartographic frame. (English)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/cart.53.3.intro

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Acserald H.,, 2013, Cartografia Social, Terra e Território
  2. Acserald H., 2008, Cartografias Sociais dos Território, 13
  3. Acselrad H., 2013, In Cartografia Social, Terra e Território, 15
  4. Almeida R., 2005, 10th Encontro de Geógrafos da América Latina, 496
  5. Barcelos E., 2017, Geografia e Giro Descolonial: Experiências, Ideias e Horizontes de Renovação do Pensamento Crítico, 261
  6. Correia, C. 2007. “Etnozoneamento, Etnomapeamento, e Diagnóstico Etnoambiental: Representaço¯es Cartográficas e Gestão do Territorial em Terras Indígenas no Estado do Acre” [“Ethno Zoning, Ethno Mapping, and Ethno-environmental Assessment: Cartographic Representations and Territorial Management in Indigenous Lands in the State of Acre”]. PhD dissertation, University of Brasília.
  7. Cruz V., 2017, Geografia e Giro Descolonial: Experiências, Ideias e Horizontes de Renovação do Pensamento Crítico, 15
  8. Cruz V. C, 2017, Geografia e Giro Descolonial: Experiências, Ideias e Horizontes de Renovação do Pensamento Crítico
  9. Darling J.A., 2007, Archaeology Southwest, 21, 16
  10. Dozier D., 1996, The Heart Is Fire: The World of the Cahuilla Indians of Southern California
  11. Ferguson T.J., 1985, A Zuni Atlas
  12. Hau’ofa E., 1994, The Contemporary Pacific, 6, 147
  13. Huggan G., 1989, Ariel: A Review of International English Literature, 20, 115
  14. Hunn E.S., 2015, Cáw Pawá Láakni/They Are Not Forgotten: Sahaptian Place Names Atlas of the Cayuse, Umatilla, and Walla Walla
  15. Jakoski H, 1989, Studies in American Indian Literatures, 1, 1
  16. Kozel S., 2007, In Da Percepção e Cognição à Representação: Reconstruções Teóricas da Geografia Cultural e Humanista, 114
  17. Montenegro J., 2017, Geografia e Giro Descolonial: Experiências, Ideias e Horizontes de Renovação do Pensamento Crítico, 145
  18. Moosavi L., International Review of Sociology. Published in latest articles, 11 June 2020.
  19. Müller-Wille L., 1991, Inuit Place Name Map Series of Nunavik
  20. Pearce M.W., 2010, Encylopedia of Geography, 1562
  21. Pueblo of Zuni, 1987, Zuni Lands Taken Since 1846
  22. Quinjano A., 2005, A Colonialidade do Saber: Eurocentrismo e Ciências Sociais Latino Americanas
  23. Radcliffe S., 2020, Political Geography
  24. Salas G., 2020, Saberes Territoriales Indígenas y Sus Espacialidades, 17
  25. Schultz J.W., 1926, Signposts of Adventure: Glacier National Park as the Indians Know It
  26. Thom B., 2001, Native Studies Review, 14, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rose-Redwood, R., Blu Barnd, N., Lucchesi, A. H., Dias, S., & Patrick, W.
Affiliations
  • Department of Geography / University of Victoria / Lekwungen and W̱SÁNEĆ Territories / Victoria / British Columbia / Canada
  • Department of Ethnic Studies / Oregon State University / Ampinefu Band of Kalapuya Territory / Corvallis / Oregon / United States
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
Venue
Cartographica
Published
2020-09
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
151-162
ISSN
  • 0317-7173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1911-9925
OpenAlex
W3091713470
Cited by
136
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
25.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
decolonial cartography, Indigenous mapping, settler colonialism, Indigenous protocols, world-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review