Cited by 102Smoking Behavior and CessationMenstrual Health and DisordersReproductive Health and Contraception

Cigarette smoking, menstrual symptoms and miscarriage among young women

Open access
MISHRA, GITA D, DOBSON, ANNETTE J, SCHOFIELD, MARGOT J·2000·Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objective To examine associations between cigarette smoking and menstrual symptoms and miscarriage among young women.Method The study sample consists of 14,779 women aged 18-23 years who participated in the mailed baseline survey for the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, conducted in 1996. The main outcome measures are self reported menstrual symptoms and miscarriages.Results Current smokers and ex-smokers had an increased risk of menstrual symptoms and miscarriages compared with women who had never smoked, with the highest risk occurring in heavy smokers (adjusted odds ratios for those smoking > or = 20 cigarettes per day: premenstrual tension 1.5 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.7), irregular periods 1.5 (1.3 to 1.8), heavy periods 1.6 (1.4 to 1.9), severe period pain 1.5 (1.4 to 1.7), one or more miscarriages 2.0 (1.5 to 2.8). The odds ratios generally increased with numbers of cigarettes smoked and a younger age of starting to smoke.Conclusion This study suggests that young women who smoke are at higher risk of a range of menstrual problems and miscarriage than those who have never smoked. The immediacy of this risk (in contrast to the longer term risks of chronic disease) can be used to improve the relevance of anti-smoking campaigns targeted to young women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb01604.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on sporadic miscarriage have shown associations with smoking, alcohol and caffeine.

    “Studies on sporadic miscarriage have shown associations with smoking, 25,158 alcohol 26,159 and caffeine.27,160,161”

    From Recurrent MiscarriageGreen‐top Guideline No. 17 (2023) · cites this paper as [158]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MISHRA, G. D., DOBSON, A. J., & SCHOFIELD, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of New England (AU)
Corresponding author
MISHRA, GITA D
Venue
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
413-420
ISSN
1326-0200 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002509425
Cited by
102
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2000-10-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Australian Government
  • University of Newcastle Australia
  • University of Queensland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
cigarette smoking, menstrual symptoms, miscarriage, young women, premenstrual syndrome, menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea, former smokers, smoking intensity, smoking initiation age, anti-smoking campaigns
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Australia, Female, Humans, Menstruation Disturbances, Pregnancy, Risk, Smoking, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review