Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 198

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning

Ranieri, Maria, Manca, Stefania, Fini, Antonio·2012·British Journal of Educational Technology

Abstract

To date, little empirical research on professional use of social network sites has been conducted, particularly with reference to groups of teachers on F acebook. The paper presents the results of two surveys addressed to the founders of five I talian F acebook groups and their members ( n = 1107), with the aim of investigating mechanisms underlying group membership and reflecting on their implications for professional development. A number of hypotheses were tested in order to explore the nature of three dimensions (domain, network and practice) involved in these groups, assimilated by authors into networks of practice. The study investigated the mechanisms of group membership and their participatory dynamics in terms of group types (generic vs. thematic), duration of membership and the interplay between offline and online activities. Results showed that groups differing in terms of domain (generic or thematic) are characterized by particular mechanisms of affiliation and participation and that mechanisms of legitimation of the members, as well as of shared resources, are associated with the duration of membership. Further research should be conducted to investigate how social capital dynamics evolve over time, influencing the construction of group identity. Practitioner Notes: What is already known about this topic: The use of social network sites ( SNS ), particularly Facebook, is growing in the educational field. To date, little attention has been given to the use of Facebook for professional development. Empirical research mainly refers to the higher education context and shows that the use of SNS has positive outcomes for social capital. What this paper adds: An application of social capital theory with the networks of practice framework (Brown & Duguid, ) to the study of professional groups of teachers in SNS. An understanding of groups in terms of shared social capital, both bridging and bonding. An analysis of the interplay between online and offline activities in terms of professional benefits for teachers. Implications for practice and/or policy: Participation in this kind of groups may have a positive impact on professional development. Social networks may afford different types of social capital for professionals. Policy makers should encourage and support the use of social networks for professional learning.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 198

Metadata

Authors
Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Technology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-24
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
754-769
ISSN
  • 0007-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8535
OpenAlex
W2106999093
Cited by
198
References
9
FWCI
61.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x
The paper
Ranieri, M., Manca, S., & Fini, A. (2012). Why (and how) do teachers engage in social networks? An exploratory study of professional use of Facebook and its implications for lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01356.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.