The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Identity, Organizational Identity and Corporate Identity: Towards an Integrated Understanding of Processes, Patternings and Products
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of previous work that has explored issues of social, organizational and corporate identity. Differences in the form and focus of research into these three topics are noted. Social identity work generally examines issues of cognitive process and structure; organizational identity research tends to address the patterning of shared meanings; studies of corporate identity tend to focus on products that communicate a specific image. Nonetheless, across these areas there is general consensus that collective identities are (a) made viable by their positivity and distinctiveness, (b) fluid, (c) a basis for shared perceptions and action, (d) strategically created and managed, (e) qualitatively different from individual identities and (f) the basis for material outcomes and products. This paper calls for greater cross‐fertilization of the three identity literatures and discusses requirements for the integration of micro‐ and macro‐level analyses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x · Cited by 988
Reicher, S., Haslam, S. A., & Hopkins, N. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.06.007 · Cited by 640
Self-citationIbarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai, W. (2005) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0129 · Cited by 518
Perceiving people as group members: the role of fit in the salience of social categorizations.
Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (1991) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1991.tb00930.x · Cited by 509
Self-citationHaslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2003) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317903321208907 · Cited by 362
Self-citation
Cited by
Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410836 · Cited by 585
Self-citationJanney, J. J., & Gove, S. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00984.x · Cited by 252
Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future
Thøger Christensen, L., & Cornelissen, J. (2011) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318910390194 · Cited by 250
Self-citationThe Negative Effects of Social Capital in Organizations: A Review and Extension
Pillai, K. G., Hodgkinson, G. P., Kalyanaram, G., & Nair, S. R. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12085 · Cited by 185
Interrelationships of identity and technology in IT assimilation
Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A. (2014) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2013.16 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornelissen, J. P., Haslam, S. A., & Balmer, J. M. T.
- Venue
- British Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-02-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- s1
- ISSN
- 1045-3172 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8551
- OpenAlex
- W1966973135
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 51.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
