The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Metamemory: A Critical Examination
Abstract
CAVANAUGH, JOHN C., and PERLMUTTER, MARION. Metamemory: A Critical Examination. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1982, 53, 11-28. This paper provides a critical examination of the current status of metamemory. A review of background influences, current conceptualizations, research methods, and some research findings is provided. Several limitations of metamemory are noted. In particular, there is no clear definition of the concept, assessment methods are inadequate, research has not gone beyond a demonstration stage, and a strong relationship between memory and metamemory generally has not been substantiated. Several issues that need to be addressed in a reconceptualization of metamemory are discussed. These issues include new assessment methods, redirection of research, predictions and testable hypotheses about the relationship between metamemory knowledge and memory performance, and the origins of metamemory. Although in its present form metamemory has little utility, a revised analysis of metamemory could have an important influence on conceptualizations of memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Psychology as the behaviorist views it
Watson, J. B. (1913) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0074428 · Cited by 3,230
Cited by
Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill.
Siegler, R. S. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.258 · Cited by 508
Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving.
Swanson, H. L. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.306 · Cited by 508
Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. (2003) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00561 · Cited by 235
Still talking to ourselves after all these years: a review of current research on private speech
Winsler, A. (2009) · Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581533.003 · Cited by 183
Schneider, W. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-0965(86)90024-x · Cited by 99
Another source of individual differences: Strategy adaptivity to changing rates of success.
Schunn, C. D., & Reder, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.1.59 · Cited by 95
Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2015) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811511700104 · Cited by 75
What goods can self‐assessment questionnaires deliver for cognitive gerontology?
Rabbitt, P., Maylor, E., McInnes, L., Bent, N., & Moore, B. (1995) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350090709 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavanaugh, J. C., & Perlmutter, M. C.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-02-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050890385
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.