The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer Group Status as a Moderator of Group Influence on Children’s Deviant, Aggressive, and Prosocial Behavior
Abstract
Group status was examined as a moderator of peer group socialization of deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. In the fall and 3 months later, preadolescents and early adolescents provided self-reported scores for deviant behavior and group membership, and peer nominations for overt and relational aggression, prosocial behavior, and social preference. Using the social cognitive map, 116 groups were identified involving 526 children (282 girls; M age = 12.05). Hierarchical linear modeling revealed that high group centrality (visibility) magnified group socialization of relational aggression, deviant behavior, and prosocial behavior, and low group acceptance magnified socialization of deviant behavior. Results suggest group influence on behavior is not uniform but depends on group status, especially group visibility within the larger peer context.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy
Moffitt, T. E. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.4.674 · Cited by 9,987
Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development.
Harris, J. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.3.458 · Cited by 1,885
Brener, N. D., Billy, J. O. G., & Grady, W. R. (2003) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00052-1 · Cited by 1,331
The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance: A Strategy-Based Evolutionary Perspective
Hawley, P. H. (1999) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470 · Cited by 877
Santor, D. A., Messervey, D., & Kusumakar, V. (2000) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1023/a:1005152515264 · Cited by 670
Bryant, A. L., Schulenberg, J., Bachman, J. G., O'Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2000) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1023/a:1010038130788 · Cited by 187
Cited by
Empirical test of bullies' status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige
Sijtsema, J. J., Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., & Salmivalli, C. (2009) · Aggressive Behavior · doi:10.1002/ab.20282 · Cited by 395
Peer Influence on Prosocial Behavior in Adolescence
van Hoorn, J., van Dijk, E., Meuwese, R., Rieffe, C., & Crone, E. A. (2016) · Journal of Research on Adolescence · doi:10.1111/jora.12173 · Cited by 300
Social Influence on Positive Youth Development: A Developmental Neuroscience Perspective
Telzer, E. H., van Hoorn, J., Rogers, C. R., & Do, K. T. (2018) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/bs.acdb.2017.10.003 · Cited by 211
Moral Cognitions and Prosocial Responding in Adolescence
Eisenberg, N., Morris, A. S., McDaniel, B., & Spinrad, T. L. (2009) · Handbook of Adolescent Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy001009 · Cited by 153
Peer Relations and Developmental Psychopathology
Prinstein, M. J., & Giletta, M. (2016) · Developmental Psychopathology · doi:10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy112 · Cited by 150
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, W. E., & Zarbatany, L.
- Venue
- Child Development
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1240-1254
- ISSN
- 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8624
- OpenAlex
- W2052456394
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 15.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Peer Group Status as a Moderator of Group Influence on Children’s Deviant, Aggressive, and Prosocial Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01063.x
- The paper
- Ellis, W. E., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer Group Status as a Moderator of Group Influence on Children’s Deviant, Aggressive, and Prosocial Behavior. Child Development. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01063.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
